More time off for Khan

I think people are wide off the mark if they think brook hits harder than garcia p4p. Garcia boxes most of the time...so does brook tbf...these pyramid theories dont quite work...when we say boxer a knocked out boxer b and boxer c took longer etc. But when garcia lets his hands go his single punch power is actually quite deadly particularly the left and right hook. The point i was making was khans shown he can get buzzed and stay in their unless he gets hit with something devastating. Garcia had that something devastating. Canelo does also. Whereas although brooks accumulation can wear you down he doesnt have that devastating one punch power. Not that he would neccesarily need it was just saying he doesnt have it on the same level as garcia.

If anyone gets the chance watch the all danny garcias knockdowns and knockouts on youtube. I d be surprised if you came away thinking brook has better one punch power.


Not necessarily talking about 147 garcia. But garcia down at 140.

 

Prescott was more devastating than Garcia if that is the basis

 

Omg so now your on about a fighter at 147 not having the deadlier 147 power but was a bigger puncher than said 147 fighter but down at a weight where compared fighter as never fought deary me only on esb

 

There is absolutely no evidence that Brook is some sort of devastating puncher. His best KO win is probably Senchenko and he was stopped by feather-fisted Malignaggi in his own backyard.

Carson Jones had been stopped by an average boxer with less than 50% KO ratio so let's not act like he is some sort of iron chinned warrior either. He was tagged easily by Ben Hall so it's not like he's some hard to hit boxer.

IMO Brook has decent power but he's yet to prove it's anything extraordinary. People are actually buying in to Dom Ingle's "he beat the stuffing out of GGG" crap it seems.

 

If you would actually read the posts as opposed to just jumping on the keyboard with your inane rubbish you d be able to get more out of the forum mate. You took a small part of a long post then questioned it. Totally fair enough. I m now explaining what i meant by the small part of the post. Tbh mate i m not really sure if its worth replying to you anymore. Its always the same shi te. Khan is the worst fighter to ever lace them up etc. If anyone says anything favourable towards khan your on to dispell the myth. Its a bit like whats the point. Lets see an indepth post from you for once. Show us something from you thats not just you on to be negative towards opinions. Thats all you seem to be doing on here.

 

Cry me a river
Put me on ignore I could not care
You telling me Garcia as better power than brook and I ain't buying it
And by your thought process Prescott trumps him then
Khan as never been or he er was on brooks level and his egarness to prove us all wrong screams volumes
How as khan ever been positive regarding genuine fighters that are British that bring a threat
He as not but bring standards into it I f you ain't holding them said standards aloft for all



Tell me you could see Garcia backing GGG up once twice anytime
Go one give me a laugh
You compared Garcia's 140 power to brooks 147 power and claimed he his the bigger puncher with the lower ko ratio
Only on ESB

 

The point was garcias the bigger one punch hitter. Garcias hitting khan at 140. Khan is 140.

Brooks 147. Khans 147. Khans not 140 against brook. Garcias one punch does more damage when khans at 140 than brook could do to him when khans at 147. Garcias lb/lb a bigger one punch hitter than brook. You even watch the video of garcias knockdowns and knockouts. Then going watch brooks after it. Tell me that garcia is more or less likely to land something devastating.