Mosley and Jones Jnr were sensational on the juice

profile view ban bet

no

vcash ban bet

yes

please show me the official bet. you know, my actual post of me agreeing to a view count bet and not some caption black qoute that you can fabricate

you look truly pathetic here in that you are so distraught because your view counts are now wortless that you are fabricating bets.





do you have an answer to this, HEADBANGER?


1,885,000 divided by four years divided by 365 days = 1291 view counts a day


can you please explain how you think that you receive 1291 view counts a day, better yet how you actually think that people believe you, when the moderators each only have:

the professor 3691 view counts in five years
http://www.boxingforum24.com/member.php?u=33213

rumsfeld 3079 view counts in nine years
http://www.boxingforum24.com/member.php?u=87

kirk 1256 view counts in nine years
http://www.boxingforum24.com/member.php?u=341

intentional butt 7646 view counts in seven years
http://www.boxingforum24.com/member.php?u=13070

so what youre claiming, while playing in your make believe sandbox flying in your make believe corporate jet having make believe team elite awards ceremonies, is that you receive roughly the same amount of view counts in two or three days as these moderators have received in as many as nine years?

by your theory, you receive more view counts in one day as moderator kirk has received in nine years.

please explain

 

At this rate, It would take Quincy a staggering 11,500 years on ESB to reach your count.:deal

 

More squealing by Quincy.

 

:deal

 

view count ban bet

no


vcash ban bet

yes


you have gotten to be made to look like such a fool here that you are wishing to have a ban bet regarding your precious view counts as they no longer have any validity

you are sad.

nobody cares about your view counts now

and they wont in the future as well

 

Queeny even though you only have less than a few months left here after foolishly trying to go head to head with HEAD, you still got to do the homework I set you.

And again there is good news and bad news from doing the homework I have set you.

Good News

Your chances of winning the bet with BANGER would improve by 0.000000000000000001%. An improvement is an improvement at the end of the day.

Bad News

See the good news,:roflatsch you got no chance of winning son best be on your best behaviour now and find a new place so you can talk about winning bets on fights that haven't taken place.

 

really?

i dont remember making a view count ban bet with HEADBANGER.

perhaps you have a link and not a black boxed caption link that you can fabricate?

in the meantime can you answer this for me?

if i post my online sportsbook betting ledger showing that i bet on bradely(win) over jmm and mayweather(win) over canelo will you leave this forum forever?

yes or no.

http://www.boxingforum24.com/showthr...489137&page=75

why would you cut out the (s) on fights to make it appear that i said mayweather bradley fight?

when i mentioned previously that i bet on both fights on two sepreate occasions?

http://www.boxingforum24.com/showthr...489137&page=74

http://www.boxingforum24.com/showthr...489137&page=75

are you that desperate when you are getting to be made a fool?

 

yes really.

Use your last few months on ESB wisely and complete the homework I set you Queeny and I have already answered the question you are questioning. And you know I answered the question because you talked about my answer to the question you questioned in this very thread a few posts earlier. So the question arises, why ask a question that you have already questioned to which there was an answer to the question that you are questioning now.

 

so i take that as a "yes" in that you are agreeing that i never said that i bet on a bradley/mayweather fight and that you are an idiot for insinuating as such.

that is your answer to my question.

that yes, you are an idiot

 

You can take whatever you want to take. Matter of fact, what is it that you have been taking that made you bet on a Bradley and Mayweather fight, and made you place grands on 93 brown on the roulette table?

 

Quincy has just said "view counts" a staggering 11 times in 2 posts, and we are supposed to believe he doesn't care about them?atschwned

 

:bbbop

 

youve already answered that question

you agreed that youre an idiot for cutting the (s) out of fights to make it appear that i bet on a bradley and mayweather fight when everyone can clearly see what you did

http://www.boxingforum24.com/showthread.php?t=489137&page=75

when i clearly stated on two seperate occasions that my bets were on both the mayweather/canelo and bradely/jmm fights

http://www.boxingforum24.com/showthread.php?t=489137&page=74
http://www.boxingforum24.com/showthread.php?t=489137&page=75

and you then later confirmed that i did bet on mayweather/canelo and bradley/jmm last night


http://www.boxingforum24.com/showthread.php?t=489137&page=77

only to now again say that i never made the bradley/jmm and floyd/canelo bets and instead bet on a fight that never happened...mayweather/bradley?

what is wrong with you?


do you suffer frim some sort of mulitple personality disorder where one personality says one thing one day and then the other says something entirely different the next?


now i know that you are a confimed idiot but why have you lost 64.7 of your vcash bankroll?

do you realize that someone that knows absolutely nothing about boxing could simply fade you and bet on the complete opposite and make a 64.7 return on his investment?

by this theory, one would be led to believe that the person that knows absolutely nothing about boxing knows more than you.

know, where is that link(not a captioned black box that you can fabricate) where i agree to a view count bet with HEADBANGER?

the same view counts that are now essentially worthless