Mosley: "Cotto vs. Pacquiao Isn't Best For The Fans, It's Best For Bob Arum"

of course, they know that mosley can beat them. mosley last fight, annihalted margo, cotto last fight, won a close fight with clottey. who looks more dangerous right now?

 

I love how all these *******s are admitting that Pac once again is taking the safer fight.

 

Mosley has not fought below 146 1/4 in over ten years!!!!!!!

 

cry, cry, cry,cry,cry.......... wipe you guys face and STFU! Mosley dont have a choice but whine because their will be no other big fights for him.

 

But Pac fought at 147 recently.

 

you have to remember that was only after the fact that de la hoya dropped from 154 to 147

 

Margarito already did something like that and guess what nothing happen.

 

UliUli is just an idiot. Everyone else saying Mosley is more dangerous. Of course he is. But this guy just hates Manny and copies others arguments. Meh... boring. His sole purpose on this forum is to hate on Pacquiao.

Anyway for me... it's Pac vs Floyd number 1, then Pac vs Shane. It doesn't make sense for Arum of course, but I would love to see that fight. Cotto vs Pac is not bad but Shane is getting older and if Pac is going to fight him, he should do it now. Otherwise he fought a corpse according to some. Hehe.

 

Ok now you're showing your true colors...

Since when a little guy like Pacquiao willing to box with great fighters like Marquez-Barrera-Morales-De La Hoya-Hatton & now Cotto...is taking a safe route ?

Pacquiao would fight Mayweather in a beat but Mosley is a beast like Margarito and Williams at 147 and therefore it's normal to hesitate before fighting him when another great fight can be made...

You should ask yourself instead why Mosley is so keen on fighting a little guy like Pacquiao !!!

 

Pacquiao fought a past prime Barrera, a shot Morales and De La Hoya, he wants nothing to do with Marquez, even though a rubber match makes more than perfect sense, Hatton was a decent win but had an exposed chin, and now he's taking the safer fight against Cotto, instead of fighting the #1 guy against Mosley.

Open your eyes dude.

 

at then end of the day, thats why you cant get mad. he still taking a risk by fighting any welterweight. but they have to selective because he can lose at 147. and not only that, he the guy everybody wants a piece of so, he can choose whatever match-up he wants

 

All you can do is call me names, but you cannot debate me properly. What I say about Pac is just truths that you do not want to hear.

And my sole purpose here has nothing to do with Pac, I've been here since before Pac was even a name, and before you knew what boxing was.

 

I'm calling you by your name, Idiot. Oh look you got Dempsey in your avatar. You must surely know your boxing. :roll:

I do debate with others, not with you though, cause it won't go anywhere. It's clear you hate Pacquiao . It's just a waste of time. I do not want to hear what? I've heard the same crap from a lot of other people, some are true some are not. That's not my point though, you just hate Pacquiao and just parrot other people. :yep

 

Quotes like yours are seen on a weekly basis by guys discrediting certain fighters and / or hyping other fighters, etc..

You can take your quote, change the names of the fighters in there and make it related to either, Wladimir Klitschko, Roy Jones, Floyd Mayweather, Joe Calzaghe, Mike Tyson, etc..... Same kind of comments (fought past prime guys, didn't fight the best, etc.), with just different boxers to discredit them as fighters and their accomplishments...

You just sound like a broken record, at least change tunes

 

:yep I don't need to parrot anyone, it's that knowledgebale unbiased fight fans see things for what they really are.

Counter my stuff, instead of calling me names. I dare you.