Mosley-Hatton.

Wasn't the Collazo fight advertised as Hatton's "Big Entrance" to the welterweight division? Which indicates an intent to stay there....which means he WANTED to move there?

 

I edited that about a minute later when I realized that wasn't at WW....but he still struggled with him. ****, I thought he was gonna get stopped late, Urango was hurting him bad with body shots in that figth.

 

Stupid reasoning from a stupid individual. PBF started at 130 and finished at 54. Hatton starts at 140 but cant even make 147 by your reasoning.. And certainly isn't destined for 54. So a smaller man can make the higher weight against bigger fighters but a fighter who started 2 divisions heavier than him cant. So we can debate Hatton vs Shane at 140 but not Hatton vs PBF at 130? When its abundantly clear one outgrew the weight a decade ago and one has never fought that low. You sir are a complete imbecile and a thorough indication of the gutter trash that follows Hatton like blind shill.

 

Thats pure garbage. Lazcano was inactive for 18 months. That fight was never in the works around the time Hatton fought Collazo. The TV networks never would have allowed it. So now you resort to telling flat out lies in some semblance of bolstering a point that has as much substance as that huge hole in your head.

 

Actually I predicted Shane would defeat Margarito handily. The only concern I had was Shane's age at 37 but I knew he is so much more better than Margarito could ever dream of being.

 

We know your stupid. And why dont you answer my question? Id much prefer that.:thumbsup

 

Please remind the board WHO Urango is.

 

No you will find my thick friend. See the quotes from Hatton that say he WANTS TO stay at WW. He says all the best fighters are at WW and that he will adjust and become better adjusted at the weight. Then him and his team went back and came to their senses. If you want to insult me, at least have your facts straight. It was Hattons intentions to stay at WW, it was the tough fightt with Collazo that made him reconsider it.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport2/hi/boxing/4767395.stm

 

Wow. I agree that Mosley would probably win, but some people seem to massively overrate him. Mosley doesn't have a great resume, has been on the slide for years, and his last win was an impressive victory over a b-grade fighter at best.

 

Your words.

 

The Ring ranked him as an ATG at 135 over 7 years ago. I have the magazine in my collection. Mosley is a bonafide ATG and you think he doesnt have an impressive resume. Another new fan :roll: Geez the memory of you kids is only good enough to remember what you had for lunch yesterday.

 

So when Hatton said all the best fighters are at WW, and that he will become better adjusted to the weight, he meant he was gonna go back to 140lbs??? ******ed fish frog? :rofl:rofl:rofl

And I want a ****ing source :yep

 

I have the vast majority of Shane Mosley's fights on DVD. One great win over De La Hoya doesn't count as a "great resume". Got a gift against De La Hoya 2nd time around, lost to Forrest twice in his prime, lost to Winky twice in his prime, lost to Cotto, beat a shot Vargas and a now disgraced fighter who probably cheated his way to the top. Anyone who thinks Mosley has a "great resume" is kidding themselves.

 

Great fighters loose. The Cotto loss was debatable as was he's second win over DLH. But the facts remain Mosleys ledger is littered with quality opponents from 35 through to 54. Wether you think they were shot or not worthy is quite irrelevant.