That's how he builds his name isn't it? Fighting floyd's leftovers and beating them worse after they were "shot" or "overrated" when Floyd fought them? lol Seriously though Mayweather has shown he can handle southpaws, fast guys, pressure fighters, and brawlers has pacman shown he can outbox a counterpuncher? It would be a great fight and both fighters would have to be on top of their game but the say pacman wins easily when he has difficulty with counter punchers is taking it a bit far. Especially with mayweathers reach advantage
Name someone who has KO'd Shane? I'll wait. Not even at Jr. Middle. Please stop making yourselves look bad *******s.
Originally Posted by Gander Tasco View Post Mosley is flawed but he's the best opponent Floyd has faced in the last few years or possibly ever. Lets recall Floyd had tough fights with Castillo, Emanuel Augustus, Jesus Chavez, Judah and an old Oscar. Floyd simply hasn't been tested, and that's what makes this match intriguing. You could produce pages of this stuff. This guy doesn't take a 5 minute break after showing his ass. It's just on to the next line of bull****.
If I knew how bad Shane was going to look, I obviously wouldn't have said that, would I? He looked like an old man in there, why don't you just admit it? I'll give credit to Floyd for taking the fight, and standing to toe to with Mosley but I'm going to call it how it is.
How in the blue hell can you look unimpressive not only defeating, but damn near shutting out, the 3rd ranked P4P fighter in the world? How the hell does this even register?
atsch You just keep making yourself sound dumber and dumber as you post. Keep posting though, it's pure comedy...
This kind of stuff irritates me...some people will just never give Floyd the props he deserves. I guarantee you that after the Margarito fight people weren't saying Shane was shot, and now all of a sudden he's shot because Floyd schooled him? Come on! What's he gotta do...beat Wladimir Klitschko to get respect? It's pathetic... Yes, Mosley looked A LITTLE old, but not enough to convince me that this fight's outcome would've been any different 10 years ago. Remember, Floyd was quicker 10 years ago as well, and probably would've had more power at the lower weights because what little power he had to begin with hasn't traveled up to Welterweight with him. Give some props where they're due.
Quit while your behind. Your only falling further behind. No one respects you contradictory statements or your **** stirring nonsense. Anyone with any sense at all knew Floyd would win and make Shane look bad in doing so. How bright do you have to be to watch the fight and then figure out what everyone else was talking before the fight. A fighter generally looks bad when they lose a fight. This **** is not as hard as your making it.
Okay I have a question? Did you think Pacman shutting out Clottey who was KNOWN for going into a shell and BARELY throwing punches was impressive? The same clottey who was known to lose his biggest fights and wasn't ranked in the top 3p4p? I have to ask because you're calling shane shot so I have to see your take on Joshua "keyboard warrior" Clottey
How does that make me sound dumb? I gave Floyd credit for taking the fight and standing toe to toe in there. Shane looked very old and past it in there and you know it. You can keep on deluding yourself though.
Problem is that you don't know spit. Again, you just show how much you DON'T know about boxing. He didn't look like an old man. He looked like a guy who was in front of a fast powerful counter puncher so he was scared to let his hands go. Where is your boxing equipment? ...so I can pour gasoline on it!:firedevi: