Mosley, PAC Floyd ... what best for boxing?

A Mosley-Pac fight would be the best thing for boxing in my view ,the problem is that if Mosley beats Floyd he has to fight him again if Floyd exercises the rematch clause and that would push back a possible Mosley-Pac fight for almost a year.

 

A Shane victory, obviously. Shane will have the nuts to fight Manny if he wins.

 

There is but if im not mistaken its only if Mosley wins,if Floyd wins theres no rematch clause.

 

Mosley has the belt... they are fighting for Mosley's WBA 'supersonic' World Welterweight belt. and Mosley is the linear champ by the way, he beat Margacheato.

 

Floyd Pac would be the best for boxing, the fight of the decade, alot of money and publicity involved.....

 

Shane had the nuts to fight manny for a long time... But SUPERPAC will only fight him at 140 and at a catch weight of 137 if mosley win against Floyd... So dont get your hopes up.

 

If Pac and Floyd doesn't happen it would be a serious blow to boxing. It seems to have garnered some interest from the casual fan and that fight would be huge. It will be another blackeye for the sport.

From a purely great style matchup perspective Pac and Mosley would be an epic fight.

 

Shane was also hard up for a big fight before beating Margo, of course he wanted to fight Manny. Manny was busy fighting a guy who beat Shane though...
Don't try and act like Floyd is all balls for fighting Shane, he had no choice.

 

All of them are best for boxing right now, and that's a shame because it just shows the lack in quality boxing has right now.

Manny Pacquiao who I believe is very overrated, hasn't beaten elite fighters recently. Clottey, Cotto, Hatton & DLH are not elite fighters. DLH once was an elite fighter, but that was back in the late 90's when he was giving the old rusted Julio Cesar Chavez a beating.

Could you imagine how badly fighters like Cotto, Clottey and Hatton would have been beaten by the likes of Duran, Hearns, Leonard? It would have been a total mismatch!

We don't have the likes of Hagler, Hearns, Duran, Leonard, Chavez, Whittaker anymore... we have the likes of Cotto, Clottey, Mosley, Pacquiao, Mayweather. Then again Mosley is not even an elite fighter, as Cotto was able to beat him just with the jab. No elite fighter should be beaten with the jab.

Tommy Hearns was fighting Leonard at 22 years old. Who was Pacquiao fighting at that age? Or Mayweather even...

 

Yep... beats me also?! :huh
Maybe it's because the belt is not much of an issue here, but their place in history is.

I think it's strange also that almost everybody calls the fight Mayweather - Mosley while the champion historicly is called first.

 

Mosley-Pac no doubt about it