No Because Mosley lost due to age the first time which was 3 years ago, now all of a sudden at 39 he is supposed to do better.....:rofl:rofl
Mosley looked bad against Mayorga and got the crap kicked out of him by Floyd and has aged even more since last time. I really don't see this version of Mosley as much of anything, sure he can take Angulo, Cintron and Margo but Cotto wins a clear UD if they rematch.
cotto wins again. maybe via stoppae this time because we saw how mosley quickly got tired the last time around.
how is that being ******ed? Shane couldn't beat Cotto then, why would he now? When he's older and not as fast? Shane lost a lot more then Cotto did imo.
Excluding the Money fight, Shane has never taking a beating. Cottoe on the other hand has suffered beatdowns from the likes of Margaritoe, Clotty, Tores, Judah, Mosley, PacGwire
atsch WTF, did you not see the 1st Forrest fight? That was brutal furthermore Father time has clearly caught up to Mosley, back in 2000, Mosley had incredible speed and was as fast as it gets from 140 lbs and up, no one was clearly faster than him. Today I can name atleast 5 guys faster and there probably more who are just as fast.
Shane is shot, why bother with a rematch? Cotto don't fight fighters on a losing streak or on the decline like Pretty Boy. Check Cotto's record, then check your ****ing brain. See?
yeah, Cottoe just fights Money's leftovers: Sosa, Judah or fights for vacant titles against world beaters like Pinto bean, Jennings, Steve Urkal
Cotto already beat Shane & the version of Shane that fought Mayweather was about 50% of the version that fought Cotto the first time. The next time Shane is getting kayoed by Cotto!:bbb P. S. drop the e off the end of Cottoe