Most Consistent Performer: Lewis or Tyson

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by TIGEREDGE, Aug 26, 2008.


  1. Muchmoore

    Muchmoore Guest

    Lewis was out on his feet against McCall, the fight should of been stopped.

    Although I agree with the rest of your post.
     
  2. Bill Butcher

    Bill Butcher Erik`El Terrible`Morales Full Member

    28,518
    86
    Sep 3, 2007
    I voted Tyson because in their primes Tyson beat everyone decisively until Douglas then he was never the same & to be fair was never the same since splitting from Rooney & co..... Lewis however had some close shaves aswell as being KOd twice by McCall & Rahman.

    If you look at their WHOLE careers from start to finish then obviously Lewis was more consistent because of the mess Tyson ended up in from jail onwards. Anyone who knows **** knows that was a man with mental issues impersonating one of the best ever HWTs.
     
  3. Vanboxingfan

    Vanboxingfan Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,591
    256
    Feb 5, 2005
    To me Lewis was far more consistent. Consistency to me, means winning fights, not winning pretty, and longivity. On both fronts, Lewis takes it. If the question was who won more fights decisively, then I'd probably pick Tyson, but I also view Tyson's opposition as somewhat softer, so it made for more highlight reels. Certainly Tyson fights were more interesting to watch, but again, that's a different question.
     
  4. TIGEREDGE

    TIGEREDGE Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,620
    33
    Mar 10, 2007
    Great thread. though you could argue that lewis never prepared properly for Rahman. he agreed to take part in filming for oceans 11 some weeks before

    if lewis was anywhere near as consistent as Mike, he would of been the most feared man of alltime. manny steward used to always go on about how lennox was too lade back and how he should be revered like Tommy Hearns and Tyson
     
  5. TIGEREDGE

    TIGEREDGE Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,620
    33
    Mar 10, 2007
    Tyson won 50 fight with 44 KO's. Lennox won 41 with 32 KO's.

    make what you want of that
     
  6. tylerrcurtis

    tylerrcurtis Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,533
    2
    Aug 15, 2008
    i dont see how anyone could say tyson it is lewis without a second thought
     
  7. ironchamp

    ironchamp Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,365
    1,037
    Sep 5, 2004
    Over the course of thier career's Lewis. He had the longevity.

    Tyson was far more dominant as champ and his victories were always decisive but that is not what the question asks for. or is it?
     
  8. TIGEREDGE

    TIGEREDGE Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,620
    33
    Mar 10, 2007
    tyson had more wins. more dominant victories. more KO's

    the reason why the likes of yourself diss tyson is because of the losses to mcbride and williams
     
  9. TIGEREDGE

    TIGEREDGE Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,620
    33
    Mar 10, 2007
    based on longevity at the top, it is lewis all the way. but when it comes to comparing performances, tyson reigns supreme. how many awesome performances did lewis really put in?

    he seemed to put in one great performance every 4 or 5 years:

    Ruddock in 1992
    Golota in 97
    Rahman in 01

    Look at tysons awesome performances:

    1986
    Berbick ko2

    1987
    Thomas
    Biggs

    1988
    Spinks
    Holmes
    Tubbs

    1989
    Williams
     
  10. ChrisPontius

    ChrisPontius March 8th, 1971 Full Member

    19,404
    279
    Oct 4, 2005
    Lewis faced iron chinned opponents like Tua, Mason, McCall I, McCall II Klitschko, Mercer, Holyfield I, Holyfield II, Mavrovic, Tyson and Tucker. That's 11.

    Tyson by comparison, faced Green, Thomas, Tucker, Holyfield I and Holyfield II... that's 5. Make what you want of that.
     
  11. TIGEREDGE

    TIGEREDGE Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,620
    33
    Mar 10, 2007
    good response

    he never beat mcall first time around. tyson never beat holyfield.

    what about larry holmes. tyson is the only man to KO him. Tyson is the only man to KO spinks who's chin was pretty hard

    lennox stopped gary mason
     
  12. smiffy

    smiffy Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,420
    0
    May 14, 2008

    exactly what i was thinking . was tyson consistent while he was in nick ?
     
  13. smiffy

    smiffy Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,420
    0
    May 14, 2008

    more losses...or don't they count ?
     
  14. ChrisPontius

    ChrisPontius March 8th, 1971 Full Member

    19,404
    279
    Oct 4, 2005
    Thank you. That evens it out, i guess.

    I agree on Holmes. He didn't have a granite chin, but the entire package - survival skill, recuperative ability, being hard to hit, etc, made him almost impossible to stop.

    Spinks i wouldn't add, though. His chin is rather untested at heavyweight. Holmes, a good but not great puncher had him staggering and Tyson put his lights out easier than he did any heavyweight since he nearly took Marvis Frazier's head off!
     
  15. Holmes' Jab

    Holmes' Jab Master Jabber Full Member

    5,112
    75
    Nov 20, 2006

    He certainly got the attention of Golota, Ruddock, Grant, Botha and Morrison. :yep

    Boring: get real.