Maybe not so well kown in the USA But the Decision of Marcus Beyer over Eric Lucas is the most shocking i ever saw.It cause a real scandal here in Canada that people are still talking about.
I don't see how DLH-Mosley II was a robbery but to each their own. Santa Cruz-Casamayor is the one that sticks out to me.
That one wasn't a decision it was a KO you could call it a controversial stoppage the judges cards looked exactly the way everyone agreed they should though. Controversial decisions (some I don't think should have been controversial) Toney-Tiberi (fbi even launched an investigation over this one) Chavez-Whitikar (sports illustrated cover after the fight said "robbed") Leanord-Hagler (people still ***** about it though I think it was a fair decision) DLH-Trinidad
i'm going to mention one controversial decision that was justified, none to scream robbery or to insult the judges. holmes - norton i also had holmes ahead by 1 point. really tragic stuff for norton as this fighter didn't deserve neither fighter to lose, especially after the last round.
RJJ's loss at the Olympics - never seen a robbery that big ever - And I have seen Die Hard I, II, III and IV...
That's right. Bonsante won every round and lost the decision. Also, Manfredo beat Mora that night and Mora got a SD.
Hagler-Leonard was the most controversial in the sense that people always debate it. It's evenly argued. Others like Lewis-Holyfield I and Everett-Escalera, everyone knows who really won those fights.
Evander Holyfield was robbed worse than RJ at the 84 Olympics in Los Angeles...that ref needed bodyguards just to get out of the ****ing ring..
Holyfield was DQ'd for hitting after the break - which he did ... I don't see how that comes even close to the RJJ-robbery - hell even the Korean looked totally pusled...