Most dominant compubox stats

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by bballchump11, Jan 14, 2012.


  1. Cinderella Man

    Cinderella Man Deleebr 'eem into mahands Full Member

    2,859
    12
    Mar 26, 2012
    You can always count on *******s to add major drama to this forum.
     
  2. puga_ni_nana

    puga_ni_nana Dempsey Roll Full Member

    41,814
    5
    Apr 14, 2007
    i did not call you ******. why the need for that racist comment?
     
  3. JohnAnthony

    JohnAnthony Boxing Junkie banned

    9,988
    4
    Jul 9, 2010

    60% connect rate from Corrales. I thought floyd defence was meant to be good :rofl
     
  4. Bladegunner

    Bladegunner Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,424
    4
    Jun 18, 2010
    :roll:
     
  5. dealt_with

    dealt_with Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    9,931
    1,230
    Apr 27, 2012
    I've learned that Compubox is useless, I honestly think it's just there for the casual fan who doesn't really know what's going on and wants to see some stats.
    The most recent Pac and Khan fights are good examples of completely made up stats.
     
  6. Badbot

    Badbot You can just do things. Full Member

    48,276
    37,186
    Apr 17, 2011
    No way did Khan land the shots they had him landing and most times when Khan did land, Garcia would land a counter.
     
  7. JohnAnthony

    JohnAnthony Boxing Junkie banned

    9,988
    4
    Jul 9, 2010

    Also compubox is just 2 guys pushing buttons.

    I rewatched that round in black and white and in slow motion and with the volume turned down and corrales won that round.
     
  8. causality

    causality Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,096
    1
    Jun 8, 2010
    Mayweather only threw 183? That's horrendous. Pac would break compubox records with Gatti.
     
  9. puga_ni_nana

    puga_ni_nana Dempsey Roll Full Member

    41,814
    5
    Apr 14, 2007
    but but... according to the TS and *****s, compubox is not important. but it is important if floyd is dominating it?

    [url]http://www.eastsideboxing.com/forum/showthread.php?t=358266[/url]
     
  10. JASPER

    JASPER Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    15,214
    8
    Jul 21, 2007

    Compubox is only a tool, anyone who uses it to judge a fight is also a tool. Its only interesting when one fighter lands 1000 punches and the other fighter lands 5.
     
  11. bballchump11

    bballchump11 2011 Poster of the Year Full Member

    63,174
    24
    Oct 27, 2010
    :patsch:patsch:patsch you're so ****ing stupid. Like seriously.

    Is it possible to think IQ tests are useless in assessing a person's intelligence, but also turn and ask for the highest recorded scores.

    Dumb ****** :lol:
     
  12. puga_ni_nana

    puga_ni_nana Dempsey Roll Full Member

    41,814
    5
    Apr 14, 2007
    the nerve of you to call somebody else a ******. :lol:

    ooohh, compubox is not important when it comes to a pacquiao fight... but but floyd's compubox record is real good... - *****s
     
  13. bballchump11

    bballchump11 2011 Poster of the Year Full Member

    63,174
    24
    Oct 27, 2010
    Like I said, you can't use the insult, if I'm defusing it and flipping it. Same thing we tried to do with the N word :hey

    and like I said you can post Pac's stats if you want. I never said these numbers were relevant. I'm just asking for the most dominant numbers.
     
  14. floyd_g.o.a.t

    floyd_g.o.a.t Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,735
    6
    Aug 7, 2010
    Well he threw 5, if he threw 50 I think it will be a totally different scenario.

    Bad attempt at trolling.
     
  15. puga_ni_nana

    puga_ni_nana Dempsey Roll Full Member

    41,814
    5
    Apr 14, 2007
    if you guys thinks compubox is **** and inaccurate, why make a thread about it? you can't say these stats are great if you don't believe in the system in the first place. or was it a selective belief only when floyd is dominating it?