obviously you didnt catch the 1st fraudley fight. he is inconsistantly entertaining though,that airich fight was fun. i find it hard to find naz entertaining because i really hate the guy,his fighting style was enjoyable but i physically cant listen to a naz interview,i just cant do it
That's an interesting quiz question - name the two he beat on points. One's easy, the other's for anoraks & Google.
I liked the McCullough fight! Yeah, he had a few stinkers. But generally Hamed was entertaining and over the top, his fights were frequently exciting, and his interviews were pure comedy genius.
obviously naz has to be the most entertaining,,,from the second that the lights dimmed,,,the slight pause before he appeared was probably the most favoured moment of any fight fan in this country in the 90's ,,,,,,,,,,,, ,,,,and he carried it on walking to the ring,,a quick flip,a few dances,a flurry of impossible-angled salvo of punches,,quick bit of show-boating,,and a devastating knockout,,,,,,,,,bliss........,,,,:happy ,,,,,then along came barrera,,,,,,:bbb ,,cheers marco,,,,,,,:tired ,,,perhaps another 10 years till we see another naz???,,,,, ,,,well??,,it is ten years on,,isn't it ????????????????????????????:huh:huh
It was the teak tough Phil Brown. With the demons of Bonecrusher still in the background, Bruno fought a much better paced fight to win the shutout refs decision, as Brown fought in survival mode.