Most finely tuned boxers of all time...?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Russell, Aug 25, 2007.



  1. Russell

    Russell VIP Member Full Member

    41,430
    10,565
    Apr 1, 2007
    Who were they? Who was the cloest to being more of a machine than a man?

    Marciano? Hagler?
     
  2. JohnThomas1

    JohnThomas1 VIP Member Full Member

    48,241
    35,039
    Apr 27, 2005
    Sal Sanchez was pretty fine tuned, aggressive counterpuncher that used to get into a fantastic rhythm.
     
  3. salsanchezfan

    salsanchezfan Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    15,030
    9,432
    Aug 22, 2004

    ............And physically, I think Russell's use of the word "machine" is excellent when regarding Sanchez. We've all read here how his breathing and heartrate would return to resting rates in as little as 37 seconds. That's almost like flipping a switch. Unreal.
     
  4. lillarry

    lillarry Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,978
    0
    May 13, 2007
    Hagler and Hopkins come to mind
     
  5. brooklyn1550

    brooklyn1550 Roberto Duran Full Member

    24,017
    37
    Mar 4, 2006
    Henry Armstrong
    Aaron Pryor
     
  6. Russell

    Russell VIP Member Full Member

    41,430
    10,565
    Apr 1, 2007
    Anyone know what Hopkin's regime is like?

    Same goes for Pryor and Armstrong...
     
  7. JohnThomas1

    JohnThomas1 VIP Member Full Member

    48,241
    35,039
    Apr 27, 2005
    Pryor was all over the place style wise, i'd hardly call him machine like. Joe Louis also comes to mind here, uber precise and drilled.
     
  8. Russell

    Russell VIP Member Full Member

    41,430
    10,565
    Apr 1, 2007
    Pryor deserves mention if only for pure endurance, though I really wonder how much of that was drug fueled, knowing Pryror.
     
  9. JohnThomas1

    JohnThomas1 VIP Member Full Member

    48,241
    35,039
    Apr 27, 2005
    The topics a bit contrasting, "finely tuned" is the header while "more of a machine than a man" sits below. I wasn't thinking finely tuned and endurance went together, but if we're talking endurance Pryor and Armstrong certainly fit. I still wouldn't call Aaron finely tuned, but he can certainly ham it up late in a fight. Sanchez is both, finely tuned and great endurance wise.
     
  10. Russell

    Russell VIP Member Full Member

    41,430
    10,565
    Apr 1, 2007
    Yeah, I get what you're saying.

    I guess I'm just not very picky over what kind of input I get. :)
     
  11. red cobra

    red cobra VIP Member Full Member

    38,044
    7,483
    Jul 28, 2004
    Both Marciano and Hagler were fanatical trainers and this can be made the primary reason that both were the champions that they were.
     
  12. TBooze

    TBooze Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    25,495
    2,108
    Oct 22, 2006
    Hagler; it was his biggest weakness as well as a strength.

    Hagler was brilliant at following a fight plan; but when the plan was not working perfectly he could not adapt to plan B (AntufermoI/Duran/Leonard). And with Petronelli's in his corner it hardly helped matters...
     
  13. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    108,277
    38,837
    Mar 21, 2007
    In answer to this question I would pick

    Burley
    Langford
    Greb

    I suppose. On they went, regardless.
     
  14. Vantage_West

    Vantage_West ヒップホップ·プロデューサー Full Member

    20,207
    70
    Jul 11, 2006
    nah pryor was a good boxer but his conditioning was better than his handspeed and hieght and ring skills so might as well put it to good use and impersonate a windmill.
     
  15. Vantage_West

    Vantage_West ヒップホップ·プロデューサー Full Member

    20,207
    70
    Jul 11, 2006
    carlos zarate anybody always in shape lanky very quick very good conditioning and and destructive one punch power a vey high p4p power rater