Most Fundamentally Sound Boxer?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by VG_Addict, Sep 20, 2012.


  1. luke

    luke Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,360
    9
    May 7, 2012
    bingo.
     
  2. Bokaj

    Bokaj Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    28,219
    13,235
    Jan 4, 2008
    As for individual punches, yes. The thing against him is that he didn't put the punches together in combinations, but more worked as a classical power puncher, going for broke with every punch (which is pretty logical if you're blessed with that power, though).

    As for Holyfield, I think he just might be the most well-rounded and fundamentally sound HW I've ever seen.
     
  3. Bobo

    Bobo Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,050
    5
    Feb 20, 2011
    yeah I can agree with Jackson not having great fluidity in throwing combinations (although when he wanted to he could throw good ones), but his punches were so accurate like heat seeking missiles, if your feet or head didn't move, you're getting tagged hard. Jackson was also good at slipping a punch or two, coming back with his own, despite him generally being mentioned in the 'defensive flaws' category often.

    Just imagine a prime Julian Jackson on HBO in high definition in the jmw division today. crazy possibilities with Kirkland and Canelo among others.
     
  4. kmac

    kmac On permanent vacation Full Member

    5,005
    15
    Jul 29, 2010
    great list!
     
  5. red cobra

    red cobra Loyal Member Full Member

    38,042
    7,560
    Jul 28, 2004
    Harold johnson was the model textbook boxer as much as Gene Tunney.
     
  6. PhillyPhan69

    PhillyPhan69 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    18,141
    15,628
    Dec 20, 2006
    Tommy Loughran most certainly!
     
  7. prepasur

    prepasur Warrior Spirit Full Member

    173
    93
    Sep 18, 2009
    speaking of holyfield...can somebody explain me and describe the way he counters by doing a shoulder-roll like movements??
     
  8. Bobo

    Bobo Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,050
    5
    Feb 20, 2011
    watch the Tyson fight, he works it a lot. he kind of turns to the right to make Tyson's right fall just a little short and immediately comes back with a right of his own. he didn't really tuck his chin behind his shoulder though
     
  9. techks

    techks ATG list Killah! Full Member

    19,779
    701
    Dec 6, 2009
    Ya don't have to be perfect to be technical. Frazier may not be "perfectly" technical but I liked what I saw from him facing Ellis, Quarry, and Foster. Looked pretty damn good to me though he did loop.

    Spinks had a great jab but that's it. Was desperate to add another name to my list lol

    Monzon was sound in his technique though a bit clumsy in footwork


    Replace Spinks with Kid Chocolate then? (Cuban boxer not Quillin lol)


    Trwas about to bring up cossing of the feet.
     
  10. Bokaj

    Bokaj Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    28,219
    13,235
    Jan 4, 2008
    He is? He had a technically sound defense, no doubt. Just a very offensive mindset - willing to take a punch to give one, with good reason.
     
  11. Flea Man

    Flea Man มวยสากล Full Member

    82,426
    1,469
    Sep 7, 2008
    Yeah, Jackson was no slugger. Waited for his opportunities. But threw with such intent.
     
  12. He needs to step up more but without a doubt, technical fundamental clinic. His fight vs a decent technician in RICO Ramos. Great show of quality

    Mayweather jr surely deserves a mention also a fan of Henry Armstrong from fights seen
     
  13. JWSoats

    JWSoats Active Member Full Member

    1,457
    983
    Apr 26, 2011
  14. GPater11093

    GPater11093 Barry Full Member

    38,034
    92
    Nov 10, 2008
    I wouldnt say Winky Wright is textbook. I think he lacks a lot of core skills such as head movement, combinations and lateral movement
     
  15. ripcity

    ripcity Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    20,449
    51
    Dec 5, 2006
    Joe Louis
    Charley Burley
    Harold Johnson