pryor arguello 1 mab morales 1 and 2 jmm pacquiao 2 ali-foreman ali-liston ali-frazier 1 2 3 louis schmeling leonard duran hagler hearns jcc-whitaker
Henry Armstrong-Pete Saron Henry Armstrong-Barney Ross Henry Armstrong-Lou Anbers These three bouts are historicly significant in boxing because these are the three guys Armstrong defeated to be the only champion in 3 different divisions simultaneously.
duran vs leanord, p4p fighter of the 70's had to prove himself against the fighter of the 80's fraizer vs ali,-friazer had to prove he was the truth only one way to do it leanord vs hearns, hagler vs hearns alivs fraizer 3
Difficult one... I suppose Louis v Schmelling is in there given its political significance, but not sure whether this was particularly important for 'boxing' more for the propaganda machine of the allies and the morale of the US. Something like Chavez v Haugen showing that boxing could attract major major crowds if the fan base of the boxer was big enough, or maybe the first PPV fight (dont know what that was but its of major significance for the sport).
:good I'd say that these are the type of fights which are more important for the sport although things like Louis v Schmelling are obvioulsy more important in the grand scheme of things,