So is the question which of these guys is all hype? Or Is it which of these guy's is actually a legit talent that is worth the hype. Sorry, the wording was weird to me.
In that case I'm going to say rigo is the only one that can back it up so far. The way he beat Donaire who I think is still a very good fighter, was a mastery.
Rigondeaux and Broner aren't hype jobs. They have at least fought somebody with name. Golovkin is the real hype job. Kazakhstan bought his title and he's still fighting nobodies. I don't say he couldn't be good, but please prove it. We don't have Super 6 in his poor division to meet non-top opponents.
Mayweather III... errr.... Adrien Broner should be up ahead of GGG and Rigondeaux. These men passed through all their big test while Broner barely got past De Leon and Malignaggi! Broner was being called the next great champion!
Broner has just recently been exposed by a never was feather fisted Paulie Malignaggi. As Broner would would most eloquently state, "thats just the way the **** falls into the toilet!" :nut