I agree that many fighters from the past are EXTREMELY overrated. However, SRR was the real deal. Let alone the fact that we don't even have access to see his great welterweight fights in his prime. The man was amazing. Chin, footwork, speed, power, intellegence, every punch in the book, and could be very aggressive. When Ali admits that you are better than him pd 4 pd, you know that you're special. [YT]60GuoYpmbJo[/YT]
If you can't believe Muhamed Ali (of all people) when he says someone is better than him, then you are a ***fill in the blank***
SRR is one of the best. Too bad he fought in an era full of bums. I have seen maybe like 3 fights and I have to say the man looked good for that time. I think a lot of modern boxers beat him. Specially Hearns.
accomplishment wise and greatness he's #1, he was undoubtly the best of his era. but h2h wise with fighters from different era's he can be beat.
I can't really see hearns beating robinson at welter, the one weakness that hearns has is his chin and at welter robinson power is probably equal or not far off hearns. Hearns probably knocks robbo down butr he's getting back up and i see him stopping hearns probably around 6 or 7. If leonard can stop him then robinson can. But i don't really fancy any 147 fighter ever to beat robinson. I do think hagler and monzon could beat him though but robinson could beat them too. Pick em fights for me.
He fought in one of the best eras for boxing of all time. He beat some of the best MW's of all time when past his prime above his best weight, after dominating at WW. Have a clue about what you're talking about before posting next time. SRR would KO Hearns. Not because he's an old timer either, but because Hearns liked to brawl, and SRR would not even try to box with a fighter like Hearns, he would lure him into a fight, and SRR's granite chin would prevail over Hearns mediocre one.
Why do you say that? Accomplishments wise he's really likely not even #1 to be honest, it was how he did it.
Jeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeesus. I'm all for fresh debate on a thing, but Ali and Mayweather as better technical boxers than SRR? What are you on? 1 - Sam Langford 2 - Sugar Ray Robinson 3 - Henry Armstrong 4 - Harry Greb 5 - Ezzard Charles Something like that for me, although it changes.
Tell you what though; Cocoa Kid Jack Chase Charley Burley Holman Williams Eddie Booker These ara all guys Sugar ducked out of fighting. And if he had fought them all, in my view, they would be four of the five best fighters he'd ever fought (1 - Burley 2 - Gavlin 3 - Williams 4 - Eddie Booker 5 - Cocoa Kid, something like that). In addition he basically negotiated himself out of a fight with Moore. Tunero, Carter and Lytell were some of the other tougher customers he managed to avoid taking on - in all of those fights, all of those dates - and Aaron Tiger Wade had to shadow him for years before finally getting a shot near the end of his career. I'd say that the best fighters Sugar DIDN'T fight are better than the best fighters he DID fight - and that has always troubled me.