Most Overrated and Underrated heavyweights of patterson/Listons era

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by SuzieQ49, Jun 14, 2015.


  1. SuzieQ49

    SuzieQ49 The Manager Full Member

    37,088
    3,779
    Sep 14, 2005
    Brian London was not a good fighter. Him getting two world title shots and machen getting zero is laughable

    Remember what Eddie did to London when they fought?
     
  2. SuzieQ49

    SuzieQ49 The Manager Full Member

    37,088
    3,779
    Sep 14, 2005
    You protect Floyd more than cus d Amato did against big punchers

    That's saying something!
     
  3. SuzieQ49

    SuzieQ49 The Manager Full Member

    37,088
    3,779
    Sep 14, 2005
    Styles Styles

    Floyd matched up well vs weak hitting short reach London radamacher Harris mcneeley

    Floyd did not match up well against 79-82" reach heavy hitting Williams and Valdes
     
  4. SuzieQ49

    SuzieQ49 The Manager Full Member

    37,088
    3,779
    Sep 14, 2005
    Klompton

    Aren't you supposed to be some big time boxing author?

    Funny I looked through my extensive collection and didn't see that I have any of your books

    I did open 3 or 4 books and skim through.... In the 1950s section it talked about Floyd ducking the dangerous fighters in the heavyweight division valdes machen foley Williams to take on soft handpicked non
    ibc controlled fighters

    Maybe for your next book you can write all about the highly dangerous heavyweights of the 1950s starring Roy Harris Brian London Joe erskine willie pastrano Roland lastarza tom mcneeley and Pete radamacher.
     
  5. crixus85

    crixus85 Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,813
    1,646
    Oct 18, 2014
    Couldn't agree more.

    Floyd Patterson's first 4 title fight purses ;

    Archie Moore - $80,214 No 1 contender & L/heavy champ

    Tommy Jackson - $123,859 No 1 contender

    Pete Rademacher - $250,000 3 weeks later

    Roy Harris -------$101,382 Rated number 3 by N.B.A

    Floyd Patterson, Occupation Professional boxer. Does anyone doubt that Ali and Tyson would not have done the same had Stevenson and Savon "got on the boat"?
     
  6. choklab

    choklab cocoon of horror Full Member

    27,676
    7,669
    Dec 31, 2009
    Pastrano, Machen and Folley were each held in roughly the same high regard when within a short space of time they each lost to London, Ingo and Cooper respectively. And this was after the 1958 draw that made machen and Folley look every bit as silly as Nino Valdes getting a returned bond in the post from a boxing commissioner saying he wasn't good enough to challenge for a title in 1954.

    If Machen, Folley, Valdes and Williams were ducked why did each of them blunder every chance at that time? They could not win a single eliminator between them.

    If London was such a bad fighter what was he doing beating a guy considered at that time to be very bit as good as machen and Folley? Why didn't machen win a fight in 1958? Why did Folley lose and draw that year in his only relevent fights of that year too?
     
  7. SuzieQ49

    SuzieQ49 The Manager Full Member

    37,088
    3,779
    Sep 14, 2005

    Who did London beat as highly rated as number 1 machen and number 2 folley?

    Please tell me

    Machen utterly destroyed London in 5 rounds..DESTROYED
     
  8. klompton2

    klompton2 Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    10,973
    5,470
    Feb 10, 2013
    I never said he was an even match, i said if he landed first it could very well be over. He had that kind of punch. So goes the theory tgat floyd was protected against punchers.

    Keep reading those books, maybe youll learn something someday, you clearly havent yet...
     
  9. SuzieQ49

    SuzieQ49 The Manager Full Member

    37,088
    3,779
    Sep 14, 2005
    I have been a member of IBRO for years, I have had one on one conversations with many historians.

    Trust me, your opinion about Pattersons reign being spectacular and untainted is not shared by many.
     
  10. SuzieQ49

    SuzieQ49 The Manager Full Member

    37,088
    3,779
    Sep 14, 2005
    It would take a lot more than one johannson right hand to stop a prime Liston

    And I can guarantee you once johannson feels listons power size strength left jab and superior skills..he will clam up into a shell and go to his back soon there after once his glass jaw becomes shattered by a Liston left hook

    Johannson doesn't have much of a chance at all against Liston. Liston is a levels above johannson in quality and stylistically johannson is made for liston
     
  11. choklab

    choklab cocoon of horror Full Member

    27,676
    7,669
    Dec 31, 2009
    Ok, Liston was the real McCoy among the many 210-220lb muscle men of his day. Without a shadow of a doubt history proves Charles Sonny Liston was the better man of the Ingo, Patterson, Liston era.

    People suspected Liston always was going to be the best of the 1959-63 era before that but he had to fight Floyd twice to prove it. He possibly had to fight Ingo as well to really prove it but his longevity and record over Floyd gives him the benefit of the doubt.

    However, I think you sell Ingo way too short. He was not some European imposter who got lucky. He did not get an undeserving title shot at the expense of Sonny Liston. He destroyed Machen and he destroyed Patterson. Wiped the floor with them. Before anyone else had too. Those two wins are the exact same guys Liston built his legacy on.

    Stylistically Ingo presents problems against any champion during a very small window of his prime. He had a better right hand than Ali, Marshall, Martin who beat Liston at the beginning, middle and end of Listons career. Why entirely rule Ingo out?

    Johansson was not a great champion because Floyd finished whatever he had by the end of their serries, he had too few fights to really stand up against the careers of great champions but for as long as he was around there was nothing more he could have done to establish himself as a new champion.