For me I would have to say Jack Johnson. All film I have seen of him has been terrible, lacked offense and defense consisted of holding excessively. His competition wasn't great, fighting middleweights. And he had many losses near the end of his career. Despite this i've seen people rate him as high as third on top HW lists.
How so? I'm guessing that you think Marciano fought mostly over the hill bums. Manassa wrote an article about Marciano that is great and he mostly writes about how under rated Marcianos oppontants are. I dont know where to find it though.
That's what i'm saying though. His skills wouldn't allow him to hang head to head with the top heavies. And his legacy was lacking but you still see people ranking him highly as an ATG HW.
For me, both of the Klitschkos. They are decent fighters but in head to head matchups they get WAY too much over rated.
Perhaps you meant to call this thread "underated"?! I'd say his defencive infighing is the greatest ever. He attacked of his defence (generally speaking) which made him a deceptivley dangerous fighter. He was also a very strong one. The holding you're refering to was very much a part of the mindset of the day. His competition as linear champ wasn't great. His competition as black champ and challenger is up there - most fighters had losses near the end of their careers, Johnsons went on much longer than mosts. I have him at four. I agree with Sweet Pea, Marciano. Just on the numbers. A great fighter, I have him at 13, many guys have him top three, some at one.
I couldn't disagree with you more. Here's what I think Johnson has going fo him in the head to head department. Best ring general of all time at heavyweight - only Ali competes in this area. Great reactions. There are videos of him on youtube, you should look them up, he's openly compared to Ali in this department. Very strong. As much as most of the others I would suggest. Mentally strong. Never flustered. For some of the above reasons he would need to be solved "in the ring". Sparring would be no use - that hamstrings some from the get go, the great Joe Louis included. I'd pick Jack to beat Joe head to head.
so beating Archie Moore, Ezzard Charles, Jersey Joe Walcott, Harry 'Kid' Matthews, Joe Louis and Roland LaStarza are not good fighters Rocky fought some of the best in his era
i very much agree with you accept the bit at the end i would pick joe louis but that just my personal opinion
You have him in the top ten, and very few people rank Marciano in the top 2 of all time and say hes the greatest. People ranking him top 5 isnt much different than you having him top ten. Its not over rating Marciano that much.