**Most people dont know how to Judge professional boxing**

I accept the judges decision. Hearns when he got the draw he always said I accept it because they could have had Ray the winner.

 

You guys keep saying that but avoid the elephant in the room. Canelo landed more power shots, which included, body shots, hooks and upper cuts which clearly did more damage to GGG than vice-verse. He also landed the more dramatic and telling shots which made a bigger impression. That in the eyes of many spectators/as well as the judges won the fight for Canelo.

 

If you scored the fight on that basis, no problem. You could make a reasonable argument there. I don't always agree with judging a fight on who I feel inflicted more damage as it's hard to measure such a thing but I understand and respect where you're coming from.

The way I personally score fights (and I honestly think I'm a pretty good judge, not to toot my own horn) is just looking not even round by round but minute by minute basis, who do I feel dominated more of the round and landed more punches to establish a dominant position. I feel like GGG did that, Canelo was fighting more in spurts whereas GGG I felt was more in a controlling position with his jab throughout the course of the fight.

 

GTFO with that hall monitor bravado you little weasel. lol

 

In fact, most of boxers think Canelo won; its the press, journalists that think otherwise

 

The first fight - YES, the score was atrocious. GGG could have won it.

 

No doubt. Truth be told he needed a time out from me.

The original ban notice said I would be on hiatus for 7 days but I came back from dinner and I was able to log on.

CST gets a little wound up and loves to display his power whenever possible. No hard feelings though this is all in fun.