**Most people dont know how to Judge professional boxing**

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by IsaL, Sep 16, 2018.


  1. vast

    vast Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    25,988
    19,883
    Nov 27, 2010
    GGG won. Got ripped off again. It was very obvious
     
    kk17 and CST80 like this.
  2. IsaL

    IsaL VIP Member Full Member

    50,553
    18,240
    Oct 7, 2006
    A good example of how people think they know how to score a fight but actually don't.
     
    Pimp C likes this.
  3. IsaL

    IsaL VIP Member Full Member

    50,553
    18,240
    Oct 7, 2006
    Defense is scored.
     
    Pimp C likes this.
  4. Butch Coolidge

    Butch Coolidge Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,305
    2,625
    Jul 20, 2004
    Harold Lederman's scorecard was the same as mine. Close fight so I can't say it was a total ripoff but there's no way GGG is going to get a close decision win.
     
    kk17 likes this.
  5. ellerbe

    ellerbe Loyal Member Full Member

    39,157
    15,946
    Jul 25, 2014
    The question is to what extent is defense scored. What is valued more? 3 landed punches or 3 punches blocked/slipped/parried. The criteria is not clear. I feel like there needs to be a far more clear set of rules for boxing. And I don't think it has anything to do with people on this forum. There are mixed feelings about Canelo/GGG 2 and a **** load of other fights between pros. So clearly boxing's criteria is not "clear".
     
  6. IsaL

    IsaL VIP Member Full Member

    50,553
    18,240
    Oct 7, 2006
    Maybe so. Pro boxing is very subjective compared to other sports. Especially with close fights like this where very little can seperate each round.

    One thing is for certain, just landing more punches doesn't equate an automatic win. We recognize that there are other elements to scoring a fight.
     
  7. gdm

    gdm Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    10,930
    6,997
    Mar 20, 2011
    Dumb cholo
     
  8. gdm

    gdm Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    10,930
    6,997
    Mar 20, 2011
    That’s because canelo was a “slickster” in the first fight.
     
  9. Nonito Smoak

    Nonito Smoak Ioka>Lomo, sorry my dudes Full Member

    53,088
    6,685
    Sep 8, 2010
    By the way, those are the official scoring criteria for professional boxing matches.

    So, yes, they do. And maybe that explains differences you have with particular scorecards.
     
  10. PistolPat

    PistolPat Active Member Full Member

    753
    359
    Jun 19, 2011
    The real issue with scoring this fight is jab versus power punches. Jab is a jab, doesn't matter how hard the person throws it, or how hard it is thrown. A Malignaggi Jab, is counted as equal to a GGG jab as long as they both land cleanly.

    Why, because in the end it's still a punch thrown from the lead hand. The easiest punch to land, least risk, takes the least amount of stamina to throw, least amount of time to reach the opponent, and even if whiffed you will not be off balance. Another factor needed to be considered is if the jab was used to control the fight, the pace, part of ring generalship.

    Then we have a power punch, body shots are typically hooks to either side of the body, high risk, takes longer to throw and leaves you very vulnerable. Same with a hook to the head with either hand, even a straight takes longer to reach the opponent and allows for more force to be generated by twisting at the hips and pivoting with your feet. In the end a power punch by the same person can probably do 2-4 times the damage a jab can do.

    We already saw the difference in these punches in the fight itself, because GGG was at such a speed disadvantage, he couldn't land power punches on Canelo with a high success rate. Thus he relied on his jab, similar reason as to why he was tentative to throw to the body, although it is easier to land than a standard hook to the head, it comes at and even higher risk, and on most opponents it does less damage than hitting the head.

    How much is a jab worth compared to a straight, a hook or a shot to the body. Then we have clean and grazing shots. The more you complicate things, the harder it is for a judge to score the fight live. Even though I am guilty of criticizing GGG, I would have rather had the first go to GGG, and the second could have gone to Canelo.

    As for the nuthuggers that said he would have laid out Carl Froch, maybe now you'll stop overhyping someone that hasn't proven himself.
     
    Last edited: Sep 17, 2018
  11. Skinny1

    Skinny1 New Member banned Full Member

    6
    7
    Sep 14, 2018
    I watched the fight and I believe Canelo won by two points.
     
    juhave likes this.
  12. PaddyGarcia

    PaddyGarcia Trivial Annoyance Gold Medalist Full Member

    16,188
    13,231
    Feb 13, 2014
    I agree with Drenlou in the sense I wouldn't call it a robbery. The guy I thought won didn't get the decision but it wasn't like he won 9 rounds that were unequivocally his. Had that been the case, then yes robbery is justified. At the same time, I'm not going to shrug and do the 'could go either way' think - I stand by my score and stand by giving both fighters enormous props.

    I do however take issue with Isal's post. Read to me a bit like "the reason you scored it differently to me is because I just know more than you and I'm a hardcore boxing fan". If I've interpreted that correctly then that's little more than supercilious bull****. If I've understood in incorrectly, then by all means ignore this paragraph.
     
  13. tealt

    tealt Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,851
    3,849
    Mar 24, 2017
  14. PaddyGarcia

    PaddyGarcia Trivial Annoyance Gold Medalist Full Member

    16,188
    13,231
    Feb 13, 2014
    Can we all just agree that we miss Farmboxer in times like this?
     
  15. CST80

    CST80 De Omnibus Dubitandum Staff Member

    245,055
    240,376
    Nov 23, 2013
    What?:eyepop::eyepop::eyepop::eyepop: Did you actually think he was in danger of being stopped or were you just cruelly misled by that charlatan Max Kellerman? Because at no point in the fight was I remotely concerned for GGG, he may have been knocked off balance once or twice, or winced, but at no point did I see in any way, shape or form him in danger.

    If you watch it again, don't watch the HBO feed, I watched about 2 rounds of their broadcast and I was appalled, the bias was beyond blatant, to the point of it being cringe inducing.