Its not that, he could fight on the inside brillantly, but he needed a slight bit of space, if too close he smothered his own work, that does'nt mean he can't fight on the inside, just that he's not a Fraizer's in that department.
Tyson had great skills, but he didn't exhibit his full repertoir that often after the 80's. He was possibly the most overall skilled HW of them all. The only thing I would hold against him is that he often seemed tense in there, seemed to find it hard to fight relaxed.
Technically he wasn't much on the inside in my opinion. Not necessarily even as good as Floyd Patterson. His power and speed made it a foolish idea for most fighters to do anything but run from him though.
Last 20 years means 1990 and onwards though, and we know that Tyson's skills had eroded a lot at that point.
I disagree. I think that even early in his career, the no-marks that tried to smother him did better than the guys who ran or fought. Then there was Smith, Holyfield. Tyson doesn't get mentioned because he is deficient in this erea, and i'd say he was nothing like as good as Patterson in there. But again, people don't have to get upset. Overall, Tyson is a whole class above Patterson. It's just a question of skillset, and whose is more complete/superior.
From 1990 to 96 he was still very, very good, I only pick Holyfield to defiantly beat him, in that period. he's very underrated from that time line.
:thumbsup Ol' Smith smothered Tyson on teh inside And did v.well - i give him 5//12 roundz + he Almost KTFO Tyson in round 12 with a Haymaker. Holyfeild must have watched that fight And got teh blueprint for makin Tyson safe on teh inside from it. :deal