Most Skillful Heavyweights Of Last 20 Years?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by amar1234, Oct 13, 2010.


  1. jof

    jof Member Full Member

    234
    0
    Apr 28, 2009
    Tyson was hugely skillful
     
  2. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    114,822
    51,903
    Mar 21, 2007
    Tyson is another one with horrible in-fighting skills though.
     
  3. sugarsean

    sugarsean Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,496
    14
    Jun 2, 2009
    Its not that, he could fight on the inside brillantly, but he needed a slight bit of space, if too close he smothered his own work, that does'nt mean he can't fight on the inside, just that he's not a Fraizer's in that department.
     
  4. Bokaj

    Bokaj Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    28,695
    14,073
    Jan 4, 2008
    Tyson had great skills, but he didn't exhibit his full repertoir that often after the 80's.

    He was possibly the most overall skilled HW of them all. The only thing I would hold against him is that he often seemed tense in there, seemed to find it hard to fight relaxed.
     
  5. sugarsean

    sugarsean Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,496
    14
    Jun 2, 2009
    From 1990 to 96 I still think Tyson was still extremely good



    Good point about Holyfield
     
  6. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    114,822
    51,903
    Mar 21, 2007

    Ever ever? Or just in the last 20 years? Or do you mean guys 200 plus?
     
  7. TheGreatA

    TheGreatA Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,241
    158
    Mar 4, 2009
    Technically he wasn't much on the inside in my opinion. Not necessarily even as good as Floyd Patterson. His power and speed made it a foolish idea for most fighters to do anything but run from him though.
     
  8. Ramon Rojo

    Ramon Rojo Active Member Full Member

    624
    23
    Dec 5, 2005
    I'm surprised that so many of you don't mention Tyson.
     
  9. TheGreatA

    TheGreatA Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,241
    158
    Mar 4, 2009
    Last 20 years means 1990 and onwards though, and we know that Tyson's skills had eroded a lot at that point.
     
  10. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    114,822
    51,903
    Mar 21, 2007
    I disagree. I think that even early in his career, the no-marks that tried to smother him did better than the guys who ran or fought. Then there was Smith, Holyfield.

    Tyson doesn't get mentioned because he is deficient in this erea, and i'd say he was nothing like as good as Patterson in there.


    But again, people don't have to get upset. Overall, Tyson is a whole class above Patterson. It's just a question of skillset, and whose is more complete/superior.
     
  11. sugarsean

    sugarsean Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,496
    14
    Jun 2, 2009
    From 1990 to 96 he was still very, very good, I only pick Holyfield to defiantly beat him, in that period.

    he's very underrated from that time line.
     
  12. MTB79

    MTB79 Active Member Full Member

    775
    35
    Dec 7, 2008
  13. MTB79

    MTB79 Active Member Full Member

    775
    35
    Dec 7, 2008
    David Bostice
     
  14. Foreman Hook

    Foreman Hook ☆☆☆ G$ora ☆☆☆ Full Member

    8,234
    16
    Jul 30, 2010
    :thumbsup Ol' Smith smothered Tyson on teh inside And did v.well - i give him 5//12 roundz + he Almost KTFO Tyson in round 12 with a Haymaker.

    Holyfeild must have watched that fight And got teh blueprint for makin Tyson safe on teh inside from it. :deal
     
  15. Blood Green

    Blood Green Guest

    Chagaev, Ibragimov, Jirov, Tubbs.