Most Technically Perfect Boxers

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by McGrain, Jul 2, 2007.


  1. robert ungurean

    robert ungurean Богдан Philadelphia Full Member

    16,456
    15,636
    Jun 9, 2007
  2. Doppleganger

    Doppleganger Southside Slugger Full Member

    1,920
    371
    Dec 30, 2005
    Tommy Hearns deserves a mention. He was a very technically correct fighter who utilized all the old-time fundamentals, like the 1-2, left jab, right cross that you hardly ever see in boxing these days.
     
  3. JohnThomas1

    JohnThomas1 VIP Member

    53,327
    45,494
    Apr 27, 2005
    Alexis Arguello came straight to mind. A simply wonderful technician. A little stiff, not the fastest but technically superb. Hopkins in the latter era. Old school. Eddie Mustafa Muhammad was also a sensational technician.
     
  4. young griffo

    young griffo Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,542
    7,380
    May 18, 2006
    -Winky Wright has based his career on the fundamentals of a superb jab and an airtight defense.

    -Ricardo Lopez was superior in every facet of boxing to virtually everbody he fought.

    -Alexis Arguello was textbook in every way.He didn't waste a punch or expend any energy with unnecessary movement.

    -I've only seen a small amount of footage of him but what I've seen of Eder Jofre he looks to be a fighter with complete mastery of his craft.
     
  5. Minotauro

    Minotauro Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,628
    713
    May 22, 2007
    Jose Napoles
    Eder Jofre
    Tommy Hearns
    Antonio Cervantes
    Rafael Marquez
     
  6. young griffo

    young griffo Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,542
    7,380
    May 18, 2006
    Good call on Marquez he's very impressive.
     
  7. Sizzle

    Sizzle Active Member Full Member

    1,293
    21
    Mar 4, 2006
    In fairness I think the 2nd Tarver fight showed some defensive frailty on Roys behalf
     
  8. Shake

    Shake Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,633
    58
    May 4, 2007
    Roy Jones breaks every single rule. His 'defense' consists of staying out of range and leaping, and otherwise relying on (uncanny)reflexes.

    I'll put in my nod for Alexis Arguello and Winky Wright. Hagler was technically good offensively, but his defense was a little leaky. Same with Joe Luis. (on the level we're discussing)
     
  9. Senya13

    Senya13 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,973
    2,419
    Jul 11, 2005
    Watch it again. Roy throws a left counter, and at the same time keeps his right hand next to his chin against a left hook from Tarver. It was only because Tarver stepped forward and to the right (highly unusual move that Tarver never showed in any other fight in similar situations) he got his left hand past that guard.
     
  10. Stonehands89

    Stonehands89 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,776
    317
    Dec 12, 2005
    Wrong. You need to watch it again.

    When an orthodox fighter fights a southpaw, a basic rule is to keep your left foot outside of the southpaw's right foot. Not only did Jones fail to do this, he also was in the middle of pulling back. Then he squared off and looked as if he closed his eyes. Tarver easily positioned himself at the perfect angle to land that left hook.

    In addition, the long right that Jones had just thrown in close was done while his left hand was dangling by his waist. Dangerous stuff. Tarver could have finished him with a right hook.

    Those are at least 4 basic technical mistakes that Jones made.

    The fact is, Jones was a superior athletic phenomenon who relied on speed, timing, power, and reflexes. That was his thing. His vulnerability was inversely related to his athleticism. Great technicians adapt to age and rely more on technical skill once their physical powers diminish. To wit: Duran. Moore. Jones was athletically superior to both, but in terms of technical expertise, he wasn't even close.
     
  11. Doppleganger

    Doppleganger Southside Slugger Full Member

    1,920
    371
    Dec 30, 2005
    Ggod post Stonehands. :good Jones did indeed rely on his extraordinary physical gifts - his technique could often be described as lousy. He got away with fundamental errors that ordinary athletes would have been punished for.
     
  12. Titan1

    Titan1 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,801
    2,619
    Oct 18, 2004
    Bernard Taylor
    Howard Davis Jr.
     
  13. MrSmall

    MrSmall Member Full Member

    142
    7
    Jan 2, 2006
    How about Mike Tyson?
     
  14. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    113,387
    48,762
    Mar 21, 2007
    How about him?

    Give us your thoughts, what ares of Mike's boxing could be describe as technically perfect (or excellent)?
     
  15. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    113,387
    48,762
    Mar 21, 2007
    If you had to pick just one of these fighters to exemplify technical excellence could you do it? Which one would you pick?

    What areas do they excel in technically?