What kg is basically saying is: if you agree with me, you're sad, but at least you're right; if you go against me, you're a sad loser...who gets it wrong too...:-( ...yeah...we're screwed!
Wasn't that the original point of the rant I just saw? If you reply, you are part of the group he mentioned....if you don't, you are part of the group he mentioned just too smart to show your face. Here's a fun fact....I don't care what group I am in at any given point. My opinions are often in concurrence with a certain group. I have no problem with that. I do often disagree with them too, something else I have no problem with. Fact is, no one is screwed IMO. Even guys who get NO respect who are obvious nuthuggers have their place (its just my place to argue with them)
Did you comprehend what I actually typed in my post??? It is not just opinions bro...it is the bash happy ignorant responses I am talking about! We can all agree or disagree that DLH and FM should fight again! But the way "the club members" respond to this is very easy to pick out...and that is what I was talking about! Having similar opinions in a debate is very different from typing them verbatim the way a person's "bashing hero" types them. The responses like, "Yeah Jack...you tell that Oscar-sexual how it is...yeah....he is a newb or an idiot...we know best...." <----that is the kind of stuff I was talking about...and no it isn't just Jack...he is just my example because 95% of his posts have that sort of nonsense in them!:thumbsup
Good post. But i was joking old chap, there is no such thing as being fecked if you dont give facts and proved no proof then you can be fecked, but not for being a bit slow and crap .
Or I was saying that no one is wrong or right......that there is no one here high enough on a pedastool to judge what that actually is in the first place. Why is everyone looking for a ****ing label in the first place. I don't recall ever once asking any of you to agree with me, or calling you any names or labeling you when you don't.
Well you are talking about those that have joined seperate groups. You have guys who will post negative about a fighter no matter what the circumstances and guys who will agree with them just because. And vice versa of course. I got what you were saying. But I don't think that was the idea behind my thread. Put it this way. The guys I mentioned post NOTHING like me. Or even about the same fighters. If I was looking for that, 196 would have been at the top of my list right? He loves RJJ as much as I do.
I can see where you're coming from. This thread could give the impression that this forum is a bit cliquey from a newbie's perspective, which I don't really think is true.
Jack started a thread about how horrible RJJ looked in the two rounds he watched of the Glenn Johnson fight. Then mentioned numerous times how Tito was going to own him in that fight :huh ???? Yep, he knows boxing....or.....yep, he knows how to bash people with different opinions on this website. Either way, I wrote this not to outline peoples opinions on fight analysis...it was about the way they typed those responses......and how they jumped on people insulting them for typing their own opinions. Are you kind of catching on to what I meant in my posts? :huh
Context.....hard to know who is serious or not. Especially on this site where one can be accused of being a nuthugger and a hater of the same fighter in the same day. Come to think of it, I should go play Halo 3.....much less complicated.