Most undervalued heavyweight by decade.

Hunter is a good call for 90s

 

Now or then?

 

Valuev was completely exposed by Haye, one paced and predictable, couldn`t cut the ring off, simply compare Valuev to Wlad vs Haye, different class and Haye had him hurt in the latter rounds also, I don`t know which peers you are talking about, both Wlad and Haye were better than Valuev.

 

Tony Tucker was undervalued in the 80`s, he fought very well against a prime Tyson and took a better shot than any other heavyweight in the 80`s aside from Holmes who was dropped by Witherspoon in `83.

 

If Tony Tucker was in his prime now, he might hold a title or if he was around during Valuev`s era he certainly would have been a champ.

 

Gonna have to disagree with valuev, valuev is straight up what people pretend Primo Carnera is

The rest are good though, I might put Cesar Brion for the 50s

 

I’ve got Oliver McCall for the 90s. He accomplished more than Foreman in that decade.

 

Tucker was a real favourite of mine. Beautiful boxer. He had everything. His father's mismanagement ruined his career. After that it was a bit too late. He got 27,000 dollars for his fight with Tyson.

 

Valuev was hopeless.

 

Mike Hunter best win was a faded version of Tyrell Biggs . He lost to Marion Wilson who was a professional opponent and Brian Neilsen.
Hunter was as erratic out of the ring as he was in it and he was never focused enough to achieve any consistency. He beat a young McCall in 1988 if I remember. He was an underachiever rather than underrated.

 

Yes, McCall's meltdown against Lennox devalues his overall record.He was a tough guy