Moving up vs Reigning as Champion

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by LightsOutJack, Dec 3, 2014.


  1. LightsOutJack

    LightsOutJack Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,636
    3
    Feb 21, 2014
    Simple topic really, what's more impressive/important? Which one is likely to boost your ATG status?

    The obviously answer seem like moving up in weight; facing/beating bigger guys is of course impressive. But it seems like nobody cares anymore about title reigns.

    There were a lot of ATG's that preferred to reign in a weight class rather than move up, e.g. Marvin Hagler. Some fighters don't move up until they start aging/struggling to make wait, as oppose to making a conscious decision to do so.

    There's been a lot of fighters, especially as of late, that jump up in weight quickly, arguably too quickly, e.g. Adrian Broner, Robert Guerrero, Mikey Garcia, Yuri Gamboa, Abner Mares.

    Should guys like Rigondeaux move up in weight considering not only do people in his weight class not want to fight him, not only is his weight class pretty dry with competition, and not only does fighting at that weight, especially with his style, hinder him from much deserve star status.

    GGG could reign in the middleweight division, but really, as far as I know (correct me if I'm wrong), outside of a new or two, and the prospect of some notably 154lbers moving up, there's not much competition there.

    Anyway, tell me what you guys think
     
  2. IntentionalButt

    IntentionalButt Guy wants to name his çock 'macho' that's ok by me

    401,407
    83,283
    Nov 30, 2006
    I am ever in favor of settling accounts in full before moving on. Cleaning out your division should be priority #1 unless you're having trouble making the weight anymore. No other reason for moving up is really valid to me. Chasing a payday higher up? Eh, okay, but you gotta eat the veggies on your plate before you have dessert.
     
  3. VG_Addict

    VG_Addict Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    23,727
    3,935
    Jun 13, 2012
    I say moving up. Beating bigger guys boosts your P4P ranking, and shows you're more skilled. This is especially true if there's better competition at the higher weight.

    Many of the best fighters ever moved up in weight and beat bigger guys: SRR, SRL, Harry Greb, Henry Armstrong, Pernell Whitaker, Sam Langford, and Roy Jones Jr, just to name a few.
     
  4. Magges

    Magges Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,887
    3
    Jul 27, 2008
    I like dominating the weight you became champion in more. Having one undisputed champion in a weightclass makes all this interim, super and whatnot belts of the alphabet soup meaningless, which I like
     
  5. IntentionalButt

    IntentionalButt Guy wants to name his çock 'macho' that's ok by me

    401,407
    83,283
    Nov 30, 2006
    :good
     
  6. iceman71

    iceman71 WBC SILVER Champion Full Member

    51,687
    23
    Jul 28, 2008
    moving up in todays era is misleading and BS most of the time.

    they jump up a division a fight a guy that just got there themselves as they were in the division below together for the last few years
    so they are not really fighting a bigger guy
     
  7. IntentionalButt

    IntentionalButt Guy wants to name his çock 'macho' that's ok by me

    401,407
    83,283
    Nov 30, 2006
    Robinson spent 5 years cleaning out welter, then spent nine cleaning out middleweight.

    Jones didn't spent long at MW or SMW but he beat the most important guys there (Hopkins and Toney) along with some other decent names before "committing" to light heavy, spending eight years and twice as many fights there and thoroughly cleaning it out (avenging his only loss and beating everyone there was to beat with the exception of Tiger M) between McCallum and Tarver I. He did get cute with the "skill over size" thing moving up to beat a weak HW title holder in Ruiz, but that didn't really prove anything other than "ATG smaller man beats mediocre and stylistically handicapped paper champ bigger man" which, eh.

    Sweet Pea spent just two years as lightweight champ but in that span unified all three belts over nine fights - and spent the rest of his career, past his prime, at welter (excepting two bouts at 154lbs), in fourteen straight title bouts, winning most of them. He did, however, "diss" 140lbs and could have stayed longer there and fought Tszyu or met Chavez earlier.

    Leonard is remembered for his feats at welterweight, plain and simple - with the Hagler showdown as the cheery on top, maybe, but that isn't a "move up" after three years' retirement. As for his exploits past that - well, beating Lalonde for the 175lb title even though it was a catchweight doesn't prove anything. Nobody considers Leonard a top h2h SMW or LHW, historically, nor should they.
     
  8. VG_Addict

    VG_Addict Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    23,727
    3,935
    Jun 13, 2012
    So, you don't think Jones's win over Ruiz was that impressive?

    He also didn't fight Rocchigiani at LHW.
     
  9. Magges

    Magges Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,887
    3
    Jul 27, 2008
    and not to forget, they'd probably fight at a catchweight, basically an invention of boxing's two top primadonnas. An invention which opened up the sport to even more of this lawyer types, like Arum or Haymon
     
  10. IntentionalButt

    IntentionalButt Guy wants to name his çock 'macho' that's ok by me

    401,407
    83,283
    Nov 30, 2006
    Not terribly. Significant, yes, but not terribly impressive all considered.
     
  11. VG_Addict

    VG_Addict Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    23,727
    3,935
    Jun 13, 2012
    Jones would have gotten BRUTALLY knocked out by Lewis.
     
  12. iceman71

    iceman71 WBC SILVER Champion Full Member

    51,687
    23
    Jul 28, 2008
    guys like
    chris john
    Omar Narvaez
    and even Marco Huck
    are content to defend their trinket titles 20 times with no unification
    that doesnt say much for legacy when there can be up to 8 belt holders at their division

    WBC
    WBC interim
    WBO
    WBO interim
    WBA regular
    WBA interim
    WBA Super
    IBF

    if you decide to defend your "belt" against fighters other than guys who have those other titles, youre always fighting the 9th best guy in the division , assuming the best all have belts
     
  13. iceman71

    iceman71 WBC SILVER Champion Full Member

    51,687
    23
    Jul 28, 2008
    you mean like Cotto vs Canelo for the middleweight title at 156 catch weight?
    yep, great point :good
     
  14. hooligan

    hooligan Millionaire Bum Full Member

    4,499
    10
    May 8, 2006
    i guess it depends if "where" the money is at....

    some fighters go up for the money fights...

    others stay if the division is packed of fighters that bring in the money...

    bottomline is moving up is better for the legacy unless your a heavyweight...
     
  15. Badbot

    Badbot You can just do things. Full Member

    47,995
    36,757
    Apr 17, 2011
    I was always impressed reading about lineal champions loosing their title and moving up towin another lineal belt(s).
    Usually a loss at the top hints at the downfall.