Billy, your logic is a bit dodgy here. You're saying you are not going to look back to domestic level yet you're fighting/fought two fighters that are domestic standard and used the world title to prop them up as meaningful contests when they're not.
he is the best on ranking no doubt but are his wins that much better that its not a debate , for me no and joseph isnt adding to that billy so answer me this why is ricky the best super feather in the world never mind britain facing Joseph Laryea?
i didnt like the way they where talking about Burns on ringside though they where putting him down lmost did anyone else get that vibe
this is the same foster that drew with Buster Dennis and Beat a 40 year old ebu champ who won the vacant belt by beating Scott Lawton is now a World beater
lol burns is fighting garbage and billy comes on here spouting shite. it would be different if burns wasnt fighting bums. hilarious
Well, Laryea is pretty **** whichever way you look at it. It's a measure of how poor Appleby is/was that he lost to a bog standard fighter that had something resembling a jab.
On a somewhat related note since we're talking about Foster Jr, this quote from a Skysports.com featured article made me **** myself. I don't know, it just doesn't sound that professional... "Fegatilli's recent record is not one to spread fear throughout the super-featherweight division. His last two fights have been against men with losing records - his last outing against a 2-22 nobody - and his career highlights are both points defeats; to one-time WBC king Vitali Tajbert in a non-title fight and to former European holder Jesus Garcia Escalona of Spain." http://www.skysports.com/story/0,19528,12183_6778387,00.html