Muhammad Ali: Why is he rated #1 when he clearly isn't the greatest?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by jatt1, May 27, 2009.


  1. Rock0052

    Rock0052 Loyal Member Full Member

    34,249
    5,939
    Apr 30, 2006
    It was a great fight. It's almost bittersweet watching it now, knowing that it was really the last stand for them (Joe, in particular). Ali obviously had more success afterwards and continued fighting on, but I concur with you that they both left something in the ring that night. It'd have been impossible not to given how much each man had been through leading into that fight, and what transpired in it.
     
  2. Primadonna Kool

    Primadonna Kool Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,545
    8
    Dec 5, 2006
    Muhammad Ali won, 3 of the first 4 rounds in Zaire..

    Muhammad Ali was beating George Foreman easy..!!!!!!
     
  3. Bokaj

    Bokaj Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    28,695
    14,073
    Jan 4, 2008
    Those guys together with dominating wins over Liston, Patterson and Terrell in just 29 fights is one damn good career in itself.
     
  4. COULDHAVEBEEN

    COULDHAVEBEEN Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    18,776
    16
    Jul 10, 2007
    Interesting Opinion:

    You have Tyson, Lewis, Holmes & maybe Holyfield all beating Ali, plus Foreman, and maybe also Frazier; yet you rate Ali P4P around 12th all-time.

    And you rate Sugar Ray, Armstrong, Duran & Pep in the 11 that preceed Ali in your all-time P4P list.

    Question:

    How many of Tyson, Lewis, Holmes, Holyfield, Foreman and Frazier do you have in the the other 7 places above Ali in your all-time P4P list??
     
  5. African Cobra

    African Cobra The Right Honourable Lord President of the Council banned Full Member

    27,342
    10,131
    May 29, 2007
    I give honorable mention to the Rock but he was overprotected not fighting the Cuban and his level of competition was comparatively weak. This is not to denigrate the Rock but I do have him just outside my top 10 heavyweight with the great Jack Dempsey one of the most exciting fighters the world has ever seen. Don't use the name Dempsey and despise this great fighter.
     
  6. Dempsey1238

    Dempsey1238 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,737
    3,589
    Jul 10, 2005
    He was only number 1 for a few months before Charles took it back with wins over Wallace and Shatterfiled, and Valez having poor showings.

    After Marciano beat Charles 2 times, did Valez regain the spot, but than lost it to Moore. ,Than cont to have poor showings after that. Had Valez been able to maintain the top spot for a year, he might have goting the shot. Besides, Charles, Moore and Walcott were great fighters, even at the ages the Rock fought them. Rocky was in his 30's also. So he was no spring chicken either. And was not overprotected. He clean out his era. No one thats protected ends up cleaning out there era like he did.

    I like Dempsey also, but I have to face up to the fact that Dempsey rein for SEVEN years. and not onces in thsos 7 years did he face NUMBER 1 rank contender 7 plus years in a row Harry Wills.

    You get onto Marciano for not fighting Valez who slips in and out in a few months time, and yet dont call Dempsey protected when he didnt face his number 1 for seven years, and his number 2 for 5 years?
     
  7. mgdb26

    mgdb26 Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,352
    4
    May 11, 2009
    Ali was rated #1 because he's the most popular boxer of all time, not the greatest.
     
  8. hoagy

    hoagy Rat Pack Full Member

    408
    0
    Jul 20, 2007
    I know where you are coming from COULDHAVEBEEN and Ali was ranked by The Ring as the No 3 in the all time P4P list recently...but that will have been down to the quality of fighters around at the time...definitely one of the two "golden era's" of H W boxing.

    Only Holmes & Frazier are on that list ever fought Ali,though Ali was past his best against Holmes and also against Frazier( as was himself),and with a different era & against bigger fighters,and also today's referee's not turning a blind eye to Ali's excessive holding from practically the start.. I believe would see fighters like Tyson, Lewis,Holyfield,&Holmes in their prime beat Ali....

    As for Foreman and the "rope a dope" ..there was only one winner( loose ropes or sucker tactics or otherwsie ) but Foreman dispatched both Norton and Frazier with ease in early round KO's,whilst Ali lost convincingly to Frazier in the 1st fight at MSG and struggled in fights against Norton....all fights were when these men were at their prime and in peak condition..

    I tend to agree that a lot of Ali's popularity was down to the public taking in his ""geatest" boast ,which boosed the sport,but does not convince me he was the greatest H W of all time...his era yes..but all time others disagree..
     
  9. COULDHAVEBEEN

    COULDHAVEBEEN Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    18,776
    16
    Jul 10, 2007
    I share your view on Ali that he was one of the greatest heavyweights ever. I also rate him higher P4P than many.

    Still curious if you rate any of Tyson, Lewis, Holmes, Holyfield, Foreman or Frazier in the the other 7 available places above Ali in your all-time P4P list??
     
  10. jowcol

    jowcol Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,333
    843
    Jul 22, 2004
    Is Ali the #1 heavy ever? Open to discussion. I too tend to critisize his second career. No Foreman rematch...the Norton problems...bums of the month...
    I've always been skeptical in the matching of fighters from different eras.
    IMHO?
    A 1918 version of the Klit brothers would have been a step above Willard.
    Patterson would have been a lean 205 lb.fighting machine circa 2000...
    Hollyfield would have been a 190 lb. boxer/puncher in the late 50's...
    Marciano bigger later on...
    Lewis would be a bigger, badder, version of Terrell in 1959...etc...etc...
    I guess you get my point, I may be wrong in some respect...

    I don't see any of the post-90 boys beating Ali.
    Would they give him hell? Definitely!

    I always mention the summer of 67 thru the summer of 70 Ali that none of us saw. IMO that Ali loses to NO ONE! I had the opportunity to stand next to him once...what a huge man...the youngsters that bring up the "huge" modern heavies? A 68 Ali would dump the Klit's at some point in a "Timmmmber" drop...Tyson wouldn't KO him, Ali decision or stoppage, He would have had an easier time with Norton/Frazier had he met them in the late 60's. To be fair, Joe may have always been a tough out, and Norton's style would have taken Ali the route but Ali always, prior to the 70's comeback, had a game plan for anyone...my $0.02
     
  11. COULDHAVEBEEN

    COULDHAVEBEEN Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    18,776
    16
    Jul 10, 2007
    Good point and one not often identified in discussions such as this - I agree with your evaluation of the 67 - 70 Ali also.
     
  12. Bokaj

    Bokaj Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    28,695
    14,073
    Jan 4, 2008
    You tend to critize his second career for this? Are you insane? He had more title fights and more wins over ranked opp. in his second career than most ATGs have had in their whole career. And you critize this because of a rematch that never happened and a possible gift decision?

    Now that was stupid. The worst post in this thread since the opening one.
     
  13. MRBILL

    MRBILL Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    21,116
    119
    Oct 9, 2008
    I don't wanna get pissed......... But Ali is an all-time top-5 heavyweight champion at any rate........ I have him at # 1.......:hey

    As for Pound-4-Pound, I still place Ali in the top-5 of all-time...........:deal

    The man was / is a boxing God....... :D

    SR.BILLARDO:thumbsup