Most people have opinions, I dont want them , I want accurate reasons as to why people though someone one... To me , it was the shock of Geale actually being competetive which lead people to give him rounds.. I had Mundine 8-4 , wont argue with 7-5 ... Even if you had it 6-6 , The knockdown made the difference.... Fire away
7-5 Geale. One 10-8 round to Mandy. Geale Wins 114-113 And how it a shock that Geale was competitive? Anyone who has watched Geale knew he could stick with Mundine...
mundine won and did himself no favours. just like will happen for the rest of his career. mundine will never have a real legacy...beside that of being a good footballer and a decent, talented boxer that underachieved but was scared of risk. he has underachieved because he got; *bad advice, *bad training, *no tactics, *a focus on money that is unsustainable as he fights cabbies, *a fear of fighting at his real weight (because he loses to peak world class fighters at his real weight), *a fear of taking a risk because of a fear of losing and therefore; *losing his earning ability.
Mundine wins 7-5 hey:hammertime Mundines punches landed This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected Geales hit the golves This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected And the result This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected
115-112 geale. But there were lots of close rounds and i have no problem with mundine getting the decision.
I no longer have my round by round card but I had Geale by a point. I won't argue the result either way as if its thats close its open to interpretation.
i despise mundine but i had him winning by only one rnd. so i could see how plenty would think geale may have done enough too, as there was very little between them.
Hey, there it is, cheers, had forgotten I'd posted it there. Here 'tis. 1 DG 10-9 2 AM 8-10 3 DG 10-9 4 DG 10-9 5 DG 10-9 6 DG 10-9 7 DG 10-9 8 AM 9-10 9 AM 9-10 10 AM 9-10 11 AM 9-10 12 DG 10-9 114-113 DG
i think the rematch could make much much more cash if they market it right. it would be exactly like a smaller version of green vs mundine contest. all u would have to do is put geale on all the footy shows, and whatever other shows that interview guests and cry poor that the dirty little mundine stole geales title and geale will smack the crap out of mundine and teach him a lesson on behalf of all australians. the public would buy it big time.
I had Geale winning by 2 points, then after rewatching the fight with Ash, I still had him up by 1 point which Ash also agreed, then changed his mind when he left my company ha ha. The simple fact that mandy wouldn't honour the rematch with Geale indicates he truly knows he lost to Geale & probably would so again. Right Ash.
What fight showed he could "beat" Mundine? Daniel Dawson? , c'mon now.... I didnt think he'd be as competetive as he was, even though I thought highly of him... What I saw was alot ineffective work by Geale. I'll admit he threw more , but you got to be doing something other than throwing... I only watched it once , I'll watch it again but I could in no way see how anyone had geale up 8-4 (115-112) , to me thats insane and clearly someone looking to give him every benefit of the doubt... Im no ash or luds by the way , I wanted Geale to win.. I also can no longer support someone who says one thing and does another... After monday night (and only cos I thought he'd weigh in at 54) I wont waste anymore money or bandwidth on him unless its a genuine fight (no , Kariz or Garth is not genuine)