No need mate it will be headline news in every country around the world when it happens and it will ..so will Mandy v Danny @ L/Heavy :deal , Money dictates these things i can understand this as much as i can understand why he has ducked out of fighting Kessler , its all about the dough . understand this TEKE my boy and free yourself , there is no Pavlik Fight , Winky Fight , AA Fight , Calzaghe Fight or father christmas lol , Just Sam and Danny again :verysad after he beats up Nelly Kim the Green fight will be made :deal That is all ....
Are you ******ed?atsch Good competitive fight....Give me a break.... There were only 2 rounds in the whole damn fight where a majority of the judges scored the round to Mundine... So even a ****** has to understand that it was a ****ing "SCHOOLING":roll:
I thought it was quite competitive, so did Kessler. Im surprised you didnt see it as competitive cause you're usually a good judge of fights. I thought Mundine was given 7 rds by 2 two judges. That tells a good story
If Mundine was given 7 Rounds by 2 Judges.....Mundine wins the fight atsch Sorry Teke....I had this arguement with Pecks at the time when the official scoring was readily available.... FACT: One judge gave every round to Kessler FACT: There were only 2 rounds where the remaining 2 Judges were in agreement and scored the round to Mundine.....That means that Mundine won only 2 Rounds on the Judges Scorecards....There is no other way of looking at it...:deal Query: If Mundine/Kessler was so competitive a fight....Why has Mundine been (despite his protestations to the contrary) doing everything possible to avoid a return encounter since he was beaten? And how many times did I state on this Forum (and was lambasted for it) that Mundine would find a way to never meet Kessler in the ring again...???
Some people just never give up on Mundine it seems. Kessler beat Mundine easily. It can't be seen any other way.
Im pretty sure Kessler won the fight 116-112, 117-111 and 120-108. That is 7 rounds to Mundine...der **** atsch
My mistake - Here are the official Scorecards ~ referee: Luis Pabon | judge: Hubert Earle 112-116 | judge: Henk Meijers 108-120 | judge: Takeshi Shimakawa 113-117 ~ ~ WBA super middleweight title Your pt is 2 of the judges gave Mundine the same 2 rds, which Pecks and I are not disputing. Our Argument is Mundine won more than 2 rds. Now suck it up ****
No mate, Earle scored it 8 rds to 4 to Kessler, and Shimakawa scored it 9 rounds to 3 to Kessler. If you think adding the 2 up = Mundine winning 7 rounds, then by your logic, Kessler won 29 rounds :rofl What Oz is saying that the 2 judges who did score rounds for Mundine only agreed on (ie: unanimously scored) 2 of those rounds - ie: 2 of the 3 rounds Shimakawa scored for Mundine were 2 of the 4 rounds Earle scored for Mundine. Mundine did not unanimously win more than 2 rounds.
He did not win more than 2 rounds. According to Earle, he won 4 rounds, according to Shimakawa, he won 3 rounds, between the 2 of them they agreed that he won 2 rounds. Meijers did not agree with either of them
Regardless of these petty disagreements that fight wasnt even close, period. But in saying that Choc gave a performance he should be proud of.