Yeh, and? I didn't say Mandy had a relationship with the IBO, I said it was fixed, you know, Mandy had angles. Tape coming off gloves and intimidating judges, etc. Nope, it was a very shallow victory that night, full of controversy. Which is why he will not face Geale again. :deal That's an opinion you get to have, as wrong as it is. So why did SS look like a bruised and battered fighter, and Geale looked as fresh as he did in round one? Did you even watch the fight? atsch SS lost to a superior fighter. It happens. :happy I'll give you the accuracy and speed, that is Mandys strength. However boxing is a combination of things. Geale had a higher workrate, better endurance, better angles. The reason why he officially lost though is because he didn't cheat. Mandy won the fight because he cheated. Setting up the tape coming off his gloves, and having his bullys intimidate the judges. :-( Good work Mandy the cheat. As I said, a shallow victory. :nono Laugh all you want, the facts are there to see on Boxrec, and always will be. Wipe the egg from your face. Nope, look at Boxrec, the details are there. Geales is better. BTW, what's with the biased **** fanboy ****. :nono Can't you discuss this like an adult? Wrong. Around the time Geale fought Karmazin, Mandy fought Waters and Wood, so what does that make Mandys opposition? This content is protected . While Geale was fighting SS, Mandy was re-matching Wood and then went on to fight Toliver. A truly stellar 4 fights there by Mandy. :rofl:rofl So while Mandy was being bashed by Wood, and then going life and death in a rematch with Wood, Geale was beating a world champion in his backyard, Germany of all places. No bud, I think it's you that's eating someones dick.
^ Sox you said Boxrec proves Geale had a better first 20 fight career than choc Far from it, it absolutely proves that geale has one of the worst more padded first 20 fight careers in aus history, and is nothing compared to choc, please re check it Also it is your opinion Choc cheated, facts are he won, and record book states W for Choc, and L for Geale. Geale sure has come long and hard since those B grade shot euro fighters and losing to Choc hasn't he? Looked **** against Albert.... who then was EASILY dispatched by Soliman, then added dogging Soliman to his list (Sturm, Golovkin, Martinez)
i have read through both on boxrec i cant find anyone on Geales resume as embarrasing as xavier toliver who is ranked 364. 2 things i am pretty sure wont happen to geale... he wont say for the next 5 years how he is the greatest, that nobody on the planet can beat him, that he can beat mayweather, cotto, pacman and that they are all ducking him... then in his 42nd fight take an opponent like xavier ****ing toliver... you are a deluded ****. get chocs **** out of your throat if you compare the 2 records on boxrec choc has fought many more bums than geale.... go through and look at every one of their opponent's rankings i already posted 7 or 8 of chocs.... funnily enough you had no comment to add about that post:-( only time choc has stepped up he has been out of his depth... Kessler was way too much for him and he got KO'd by featherfists Ottke a guy who had 4kos in 30+wins
^ Total fail stewy, Geale has an embarrasing record and was beaten soundly by Choc. Geale ducks all comers, is one of the larger cowards in the game. Sturm (Confirmed Duck) Martinez (Confirmed Duck) Golovkin (Confirmed Duck) Soliman, recent Duck, Hell, he has ducked any of the premium local talent. As to your "won't be claiming he is the best for 5 years" He will be, it's just that no one is listening to him. He is irrelevant. has a very small fanbase, not much talent, and less heart than a katsidis. In 20 years time, we will still all be talking about Choc, Geale won't be remembered. (Accept for his twice defeat to choc-- thats right choc will take his paper belt when he feels like it)
Geale vs Ian Mackillop March 09,. Mackillip last 5 fights, 4 losses and a draw, 3 ko’s Geale vs Nonoy Gonzales 06. Gonzales lost 4 previous fights, and was fighting at 140pds, so Geale fought someone not even ranked at 140 pounds, at m/w. Geale vs Timo Misua, Masua lost 8 of 9 previous, including being ko’s in 7 of those fights. There are many more I could list, but to say his early career is anything other than shithouse is funny. Geale early career blueprint was to fight someone who had been ko’d in 80% of previous 5 bouts, blown up welters or d grade domestic. Geale came up short against Choc, nothing you ever say changes that- Choc has proven to be greater and your suppositions are just that. Geale has not proven to be a coward, and on record ducks the best Sturm, Golovkin, Martinez Geale even ducks bgrade domestic, Soliman., You give him credit for not talkin ****, he does, just no one listens as he is irrelevant and has no fan base whatsoever! Easy to be humble, when no one knows your name and you are not given exposure
don't know why anyone would want to have a discussion with u when u write complete GARBAGE like that.
thank you for confirming what a ****** you are choc has ducked more than anyone on the planet golovkin, kessler, geale, trout and many others... he is king of the duck. Geale wasnt beaten soundly by choc and you saying so confirms your one eyed opinions being spouted here. Choc shat himself and ran away as fast as he could from the rematch... FACT he just ducked Trout after talking it up for the past 3 months and we await his next tomato can. he said he didnt want to fight Trout as they are "shooting for bigger"... well lets just wait and see who this fighter is that is bigger than a world title shot against Trout
I honestly cannot grasp what point you are trying to make here as it is unintelligible drivel. I suspect you have an iq in the 70's so i apologise for having called you a ******, you cannot help it. Not related to choc are you?
If choc is shooting for bigger than trout and toprank are giving him a "showcase" fight first....why not make the showcase fight trout??? Pick up a belt whilst he is at it. He should be locked up for lying out of his ass.
Don't waste you time with the Gaylord mate, he will argue his nonexistent points to the death. Just a real ****wit here to stir **** :-(
I agree on this, Trout is a perfect showcase fight. I'm guessing he'll prob fight a former world champ who has a bigger name than Trout but not as good of a fighter.
I heard that the man mite be fighting on the Gamboa v rios undercard. That is what From tha man himself. I seen him in burleigh today.