MUST WATCH BOXING SURVEY - FINAL RESULTS

Well I do soon, probably will be numbered Marciano vs. Walcott I as first and that on top my number 5 maybe (there could be Corrales vs. Castillo I and Graziano vs. Zale II between), also could be from the number Jones vs. Lebedev a little bit higher (as it was more competitive than Mosley vs. Margarito or even Barrera vs. Hamed and Schmeling vs. Louis I). The two Super-Middleweight bouts could get the lowest number, or I replace one for Pavlik (just as can be Freitas vs. Barrios in it). Salido had also some more classics (vs. Martinez) as Miura has too. And I'm not sure if I keep Lyakowitsch in it or substitute him for Krasniqi instead. Marquez vs. Diaz I will I put on a higher number possible as well, maybe just one push off between Maidana vs. Ortiz and this.

 

I’ve ordered my list, took one fight out and added one in its place. I may make further changes in time but this will be the base from which I work if I do.

Thanks to @Rumsfeld for this.

 

How can be Lufcrazy be rated, when he didn't fill the task? He only wrote either the first name or the last name of each boxer. So there is no complette boxer let alone fight listed by whom. We can't be even certain who he meant, in few of the matches!

The same to William Walker, who only used surnames (how do we know which Spinks is meant, out of the three?).

 

• 
  
  

  ---

  
  

  Click here to register a FREE forum account and REMOVE ADS

  
  
  

@Rumsfeld can I just double check something with you?

Does it matter to you whether the lists have v, v., vs or vs. between the names and whether a fight number is described by number or roman numerals?

I noticed in your example that you used vs and not v so I updated my list to match your style. I had already used numbers, which matched your example, not roman numerals so didn't change that.

Just checking whether that matters to you for your formatting purposes.

 

I will check that I have winners first. In a multi-fight series I go with who won the series first so I’ll make sure (if they split it’s just which one comes to mind first).

EDIT: I think mine is correctly formatted now.

 

I meant to start this already but just got my three girls a puppy. Spending all my time acclimating them all. Bit tired.

 

Crazy Horse 23

1. Sugar Ray Leonard vs Thomas Hearns I
2. Joe Frazier vs Muhammad Ali I
3. Aaron Pryor vs Alexis Arguello I
4. Marvin Hagler vs Thomas Hearns
5. Larry Holmes vs Ken Norton
6. Diego Corrales vs Jose Luis Castillo I
7. George Foreman vs Ron Lyle
8. Muhammad Ali vs Joe Frazier III
9. Roberto Duran vs Sugar Ray Leonard I
10. Archie Moore vs Yvon Durelle I
11. Rocky Marciano vs Jersey Joe Walcott I
12. Julio Caesar Chavez vs Meldrick Taylor I
13. Evander Holyfield vs Mike Tyson I
14. Chris Eubank vs Michael Watson II
15. Bernard Hopkins vs Felix Trinidad
16. Nigel Benn vs Gerald McClellan
17. Matthew Saad Muhammad vs Yaqui Lopez I
18. Riddick Bowe vs Evander Holyfield I
19. Simon Brown vs Tyrone Trice I
20. Carlos Monzon vs Bennie Briscoe II
21. Eric Morales vs Marco Antonio Barrera I
22. Anthony Joshua vs Wladimir Klitschko
23. Marlon Starling vs Lloyd Honeyghan
24. Salvador Sanchez vs Danny Lopez I
25. James "Buster" Douglas vs Mike Tyson

 

Burley vs. Ortega?

 

i like some of your unorthodox mentions and ranking

 

I wrote the first and last names of both boxers as far as I can tell.

Just number your list ffs.

 

Errm... this doesn't look so.

But I did it already few week ago.
But I'm not sure if a participation makes sense, as the is the suspicion of bias in the scoring (because you are influenced in it and have tight connections to the creater of this topic).

 

That's not my list lmao.

 

Thank you. I figure, if this is a list to get someone to love boxing, then some of the more contemporary guys deserve a viewing too. Boxing is past and present and there are a multitude of things to appreciate.

 

Actually, I was thinking more of Muhammad-Lopez I, Monzon-Briscoe II, and Starling-Honeyghan. I can't see many people putting them up that high.