Mustafa Hamsho vs. Juan Domingo Roldan in 1984

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by KOTF, May 9, 2010.


  1. KOTF

    KOTF Bingooo Full Member

    13,448
    29
    Jun 2, 2009
    This could have came off. Who wins and why?
     
  2. redrooster

    redrooster Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,635
    335
    Jan 29, 2005
    Roldan was on the upswing and gave Marvin a much tougher fight but then, Hagler improved later in the year. Edge goes to Roldan
     
  3. Duodenum

    Duodenum Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,632
    345
    Apr 18, 2007
    I wish I could retract my impulse vote, which was reflexively a peak for peak projection. Best against best, I think Hamsho successfully fields Roldan's firepower, and brawls his way to a decision. However, Mustafa was a bit past it in 1984 after the wars he'd been through, and Juan was a few years younger. Given all that, I think Rooster might be right on this one. (Admittedly, the outcome of Hagler-Hamsho II is pivotal in forming my conclusion.) Although Hamsho did manage a huge win over a shockingly faded Benitez, I don't think he ever really recovered from the loss of Paddy Flood in March 1983. (Flood was just 48 when he was killed by a cerebral hemorrhage, and Hamsho was tearfully inconsolable in the post fight interview.)
     
  4. red cobra

    red cobra Loyal Member Full Member

    38,042
    7,584
    Jul 28, 2004
    It would be the middleweight equivalent of the Bonavena-Chuvalo fight, with Roldan as Bonavena and Hamsho as Chuvalo...a very awkward, crude sort of fight and maybe a flash kd of Hamsho..with Roldan getting an ugly decision.
     
  5. kenmore

    kenmore Boxing Addict Full Member

    7,132
    30
    Jan 29, 2008
    Hamsho would have whipped Roldan's ass by decision.
     
  6. brownpimp88

    brownpimp88 Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,378
    10
    Feb 26, 2007
    i think hamsho was the better fighter between the two.
     
  7. Titan1

    Titan1 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,500
    3,030
    Oct 18, 2004
    At this point in time Roldan takes a UD over 10 or 12 rounds.
     
  8. laxpdx

    laxpdx Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,931
    82
    Oct 1, 2006
    I'd say Roldan, based on their respective Hagler performances.
     
  9. MRBILL

    MRBILL Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    21,116
    119
    Oct 9, 2008
    Hamsho was limp and faded by 1984 at 160, while Roldan was peaked...... Yes, both men lost to Hagler that year, but Roldan had the much better showing...

    MR.BILL
     
  10. MAG1965

    MAG1965 Loyal Member banned

    34,796
    66
    Dec 1, 2008
    I think Roldan was too strong for Hamsho. Roldan fought in an era where he fought too many greats Hagler and Hearns and a very good Nunn.
     
  11. MagnaNasakki

    MagnaNasakki Boxing Junkie Full Member

    7,658
    78
    Jan 21, 2006
    Hamsho was fading in 1984.

    Roldan would have probably been able to get it done.

    Prime for prime, Hamsho is beast and would probably reverse the outcome in a fight that is just as tough.

    I would have loved to see this.