My American friends: It is endearing, your excitement about SSM - Cotto.

No need to spew utter garbage any longer which is all that you seem to be able to contribute. Well.....even though you are not trying to be entertaining and funny....you are. I'm having a hard time figuring out if I should feel sorry for you and try to educate you or just laugh b/c why waste time with someone who has almost no chance at actually providing something with validity...:rofl Good luck my good man.....good luck.

 

:-( What a sad, sad little man you are. Im sure you get some predication right.....like all of Joe's fights, but I find it extremely hard to believe that you actually get predictions correct off of being a knowledgable boxing fan....Maybe you are great at guessing, but But it seems boxing and it's essense eludes you very well.

 

WOW CHJ :scaredas: :scaredas: :scaredas:

This time you actually seem serious? You usually assume Joe will thrash MK.

:huh

 

They are related but is not the same thing; an apple is a fruit, but a fruit is not an apple. Things are categorized within different labels for a reason, and it is good form to use the correct ones.

 

He has some deluded nutjobs on his side no doubt, but I dont beleive even CHJ would have JC at no1 p4p.





Would he?:admin

 

You are correct, it is the best way to adress a boxers brilliance, when going up against elites. However, you don't have to beat an elite to showcase that you are an elite. In example: Cotto. Some fighters are ducked. Other fighters are overrated simply, because they are recognisable names. As sports fans, we are the ones, who should be able to decifre **** from snot.

I agree zeros doesn't mean everything - however, since they are unbeaten, and havent shown any signs of weaknesses, it's fairly hard to say what it would take to bring them down, or how far they can take their skills and talents. In the case of Calzaghe, you acknowledge that he is talented, you just find it wasted. That may be - but nothing I have seen indicates that anyone in the p4p lists could beat him, nor anyone from 160-175, maybe except Kessler - which we shall soon find out.

Concerning the Shane thing - maybe I just read your post wrong - it was rather late for me(6-7 am). However, alot of Shane's legacy and greatness is reflected on whom he has met, and those people have been elites that are no longer prime, some even shades(Vargas), which means that their current label is not as valid as before.

So strip that away, we can only go by what he can do in the ring, and there I don't see him any greater than Calzaghe.

Just my 2 cents.

 

I think you missed the time, where CHJ had sleepless nights out of concern for this match.

 

Maybe I did... Ive been in London the last couple of days and work is seriously killing time at the moment.

I understand his sleepless nights. I'll go search for it.

 

I respect that....I don't agree with everything but I do see your angle. One thing I will comment on is The undefeated fighters CAN be undefeated and still show signs of weakness...whether its mentally, in their offense, Defense, Preparation or heart. With Joe I think he is very skill, very talented and very smart.....but I question his "Champions Heart" I know he has heart b/c he has been down and came back to win, but it was a flash KD at the hands of an old and over matched Mitchell who never should have landed that blow....Anyways...I think Joe wasted much of his BEST years by being complacent and settling for the WBO title and fighting weak to decent oppostion to keep that "0"...which again, doesnt' mean all that much.

 

to top WW's who come to fight every time, Shane is a probable future HOF'er and Cotto is on the cusp - great crossroads fight.

 

:rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl

atsch

 

This content is protected

Kessler looks bigger than Cal, any other pics?

 

Are we going to have to continue to see posts like this after Kessler knocks the **** out of Calzaghe?