My card: Mosley 116, Cotto 112

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by paulfv, Nov 10, 2007.


Page 3 of 6
  1. Druid

    Druid Member Full Member

    486
    0
    Jan 4, 2005
    Very arrogant of you to think you know more than the majority of the people on this blog and the judges. Anyway, really doesn't matter what u say, time to face reality.
     
    Druid, Nov 10, 2007
    Druid, Nov 10, 2007
    #31
  2. paulfv

    paulfv Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,853
    0
    Jul 7, 2007
    Sorry bud, truth can hurt.

    Very arrogant and factually incorrect for you to say that Mosley said Cotto won. Garbage. Mosley tried to be classy, but he did not say he thought Cotto won. I watched the interview.
     
    paulfv, Nov 10, 2007
    paulfv, Nov 10, 2007
    #32
  3. hmi

    hmi Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,257
    0
    Sep 14, 2007
    When the fight was decided on the scorecard, I was already thinking that the fight will go to Cotto because he is still young and boxing can still benefit from him wherein Mosley is already at his retiring age. That's just what happened.

    Politics of boxing included in the scorecard!
     
    hmi, Nov 10, 2007
    hmi, Nov 10, 2007
    #33
  4. paulfv

    paulfv Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,853
    0
    Jul 7, 2007
    You got it. Really sad about that.

    And I was thinking exactly what you were. I knew Cotto would get it, sadly.
     
    paulfv, Nov 10, 2007
    paulfv, Nov 10, 2007
    #34
  5. Druid

    Druid Member Full Member

    486
    0
    Jan 4, 2005
    I have said in several post that he all but admitted that Cotto won. That is true. Apparently u did watch the interview but with the same attention u paid the fight and read my posts.
     
    Druid, Nov 10, 2007
    Druid, Nov 10, 2007
    #35
  6. yesihavearm

    yesihavearm Active Member Full Member

    1,498
    1
    May 15, 2007
    Dude I like Cotto.

    But he got outworked, outlanded (SEE COMPUBOX).

    Nearly went down in the 9th and got saved by the ref.

    Ran for the last 4 rounds.

    Theres no way Cotto won that fight, HBO have a vested interest.
     
    yesihavearm, Nov 10, 2007
    yesihavearm, Nov 10, 2007
    #36
  7. hmi

    hmi Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,257
    0
    Sep 14, 2007
    You might want to see the stats first before uttering these words.
     
    hmi, Nov 10, 2007
    hmi, Nov 10, 2007
    #37
  8. cuchulain

    cuchulain Loyal Member Full Member

    36,356
    11,392
    Jan 6, 2007
    Can't agree.

    I could live with 115-113 for either guy or anything in between.

    I scored it a draw.

    My opinion of either guy isn't going to change based on what the judges had to say.

    I disagree with the decision but it was NOT a robbery.

    Good post.

    I would not give Sugar round 11 but the rest of your scoring is close.
     
    cuchulain, Nov 10, 2007
    cuchulain, Nov 10, 2007
    #38
  9. paulfv

    paulfv Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,853
    0
    Jul 7, 2007
    No, you are giving your interpretation. You are wrong. You heard what you wanted to hear.

    Mosley was classy, he handled his raw deal well.
     
    paulfv, Nov 10, 2007
    paulfv, Nov 10, 2007
    #39
  10. justsightseeing

    justsightseeing New Member Full Member

    74
    0
    Nov 10, 2007
    **** the stats. I seen the fight. :lol: Shane was trying to land the clubbing right hand and did so very seldom. Meanwhile Cotto hit Shane with everything but the kitchen sink. CLEAN. FLUSH. If Shane blocked ANY punches you guys have a case. But he did not, so he lost.
     
    justsightseeing, Nov 10, 2007
    justsightseeing, Nov 10, 2007
    #40
  11. Druid

    Druid Member Full Member

    486
    0
    Jan 4, 2005
    I couldn't disagree with you more, Cotto boxed and that seems to be confusing his detractor as he showed yet another facit of his boxing skillz and people are confusing that with running. Cotto won both the 11th and 12th, just becuse he was going backwards doesn;t mean he isn;t the more effective fighter.
     
    Druid, Nov 10, 2007
    Druid, Nov 10, 2007
    #41
  12. paulfv

    paulfv Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,853
    0
    Jul 7, 2007
    Thanks.

    I'll have to re-watch round 11. I don't think it was a robbery either. I just felt Shane won.

    Cotto acquitted himself VERY well.

    I just think that the 'top brass' in the sport did not want to see Cotto lose his '0,' as he is the 'next big thing' to market.

    Shane already has losses, and is almost out of the sport. So it's easier to have this kind of judging not in his favor. Just like Hopkins and Taylor, just like Toney and Peter.

    This isn't the first time this has happened, and it won't be the last. One of the sad truths of the sport.
     
    paulfv, Nov 10, 2007
    paulfv, Nov 10, 2007
    #42
  13. RafaelGonzal

    RafaelGonzal Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,844
    13
    Mar 7, 2006
    you guys are so ****ing biased its insane it was A CLOSE FIGHT GET OVER IT
    COTTO DESERVED IT AND WON.....
     
    RafaelGonzal, Nov 10, 2007
    RafaelGonzal, Nov 10, 2007
    #43
  14. paulfv

    paulfv Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,853
    0
    Jul 7, 2007
    Cotto = PBF for the last 4 rounds of the fight.

    So much for the 'out-will' you stuff.

    He lost. He showed a ton of heart, but he was the lesser man tonight.
     
    paulfv, Nov 10, 2007
    paulfv, Nov 10, 2007
    #44
  15. Druid

    Druid Member Full Member

    486
    0
    Jan 4, 2005
    If you really think boxing is still that corrupt then why watch it, if that were the case it would be no better than WWE for ****s sake, is that what u are saying??? You are calling professional people corrupt because u disagree with someone elses decision, that is a huge leap to take and again very arrogant.
     
    Druid, Nov 10, 2007
    Druid, Nov 10, 2007
    #45
Page 3 of 6