My controversial belief..... IMO Bradley beat Pacquiao

Yeah, 99% of the named boxing writers are prejudiced and wrong, including Pac nutriders like Jeff and Floyd Sr, and you and this obvious alt got it nailed down. Hey I respect your right to see it differently, I don't believe your opinion is agenda ladden like the other guy. I just wanted you to know it's a far fringe score, as far as expert opinion goes.

 

I'll take your word for it, alt

 

There is a vid on YouTube that got used a lot on here months ago that highlighted bunch of Mannys missed shots but later in the vid it did a highlight punch by punch for Bradley going jabs then crosses hooks uppercuts to even body attack

 

Fair enough but I'd be willing to bet a good chunk of those scores would change watching it again more closely

I myself have scored the fight several ways

My main point is that this isn't a blowout and Bradley gets no credit for a solid fight

 

Yeah but Clottey didn't have any of the offensive or generalship success Bradley had

Clottey never controlled 2 minutes of a round like Bradley did

 

I think i saw that but it didn't show the entire picture. I want to show everything from 1-12. His jabbing, ring general ship, defense, body work and combination punching. I think people would be shocked to see all the good work Tim did in this fight, especially his defense.

 

He did (officially) beat Pacquiao. Case closed.

 

I guess it's really an amazing fight, that 90% saw wide, but on multiple rewatch it turns out to be close, if you supplement with some edited videos and slomo. Well boxing is then doomed, cause 99% of the viewers go with their first impression, few bother with slomo replays. Please let me know Rios Abril looks in slomo. I wonder if it was a right decision after all.

 

You don't believe robberies exist in boxing? You think Floyd really lost to that Bulgar plumber in the Olympics?

 

Ouch, that hurts coming from a craven alt

 

I didn't see that fight, nor do I give a ****. I believe Marquez was clearly robbed in the 3rd Pacquiao fight, but *******s insisted that the only scorecards that matter are the official judges' scorecards. Funny how they abandoned that line of reasoning as soon as it no longer fit their lame agenda. :yep

 

And what you just said makes all the sense in the world. It must be frustrating for you. I can't speak for anyone else but all i'm saying is that the fight was competitive and close. I see a score of 7-5 or 8-4 for Manny as reasonable. But when you go 9-3 or beyond, i would disagree. Personally, when i watched it a while back, i think i had it 7-5 for Pac or a draw. I might watch it again and post my scorecards on this thread.