My issue with guys like Itauma and Bam

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by ellerbe, Mar 30, 2026.


  1. Dynamicpuncher

    Dynamicpuncher Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    17,625
    38,068
    Jan 14, 2022
    My point is you can't compare Tyson's first 14 professional fights to Itauma simply because Tyson was fighting every 3 weeks.

    So saying Itauma may or may not have fought better opposition than Tyson after 14 professional fights. Is missing a huge context in regards to how active both fighters were/are in comparison.
     
    Last edited: Mar 31, 2026
    PopPellegrino likes this.
  2. Wizbit1013

    Wizbit1013 Drama go, and don't come back Full Member

    15,285
    19,628
    Mar 17, 2018
    I think it's the biggest part tbh

    Fighters know they are being paid to fight a golden boy want paying as such
    That mentality would still be there if Turki and Dana didn't exist

    I remember reading years ago Tysons inital opposition were paid modestly at best
    For the life of me I can't recall the publication but it made alot of sense at the time
     
  3. Kiwi Casual

    Kiwi Casual Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,264
    6,730
    Jul 31, 2021
    Mike Tyson is obviously more accomplished than Itauma, but trying to use the "but he fought more!" argument when most of those fighters were club level isn't a genuine argument. The comparison was on who they fought as their 14th opponent.
     
    Wizbit1013 likes this.
  4. Dynamicpuncher

    Dynamicpuncher Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    17,625
    38,068
    Jan 14, 2022
    There is no comparison because Tyson fought 14 professional fights in less than a year.

    Whilst Itauma is in his 3rd year.

    That's the point.
     
    Last edited: Mar 31, 2026
    PopPellegrino and Ice8Cold like this.
  5. Kiwi Casual

    Kiwi Casual Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,264
    6,730
    Jul 31, 2021
    Doesn't matter, because the comparison is on the 14th opponent. Not how many club fighters Tyson churned through in 3 years.
     
  6. Dynamicpuncher

    Dynamicpuncher Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    17,625
    38,068
    Jan 14, 2022
    Yes it does matter and there's big missing context without mentioning it instead of just listing the number of 14 professional fights.

    How about comparing Tyson's 3rd year as a professional to Itauma ?
     
    PopPellegrino likes this.
  7. Kiwi Casual

    Kiwi Casual Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,264
    6,730
    Jul 31, 2021
    Compare away, I've already acknowledged Mike Tyson is more accomplished.

    But that wasn't the comparison you disagreed with.
     
  8. Dynamicpuncher

    Dynamicpuncher Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    17,625
    38,068
    Jan 14, 2022
    The comparison I disagreed with was what another poster said comparing Itauma's 14 professional fights over 3 years to Tyson's 14 professional fights in less than a year.
     
    PopPellegrino likes this.
  9. Kiwi Casual

    Kiwi Casual Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,264
    6,730
    Jul 31, 2021
    The comparison was on their first 14 opponents and their quality, not the length of time it took to fight them.
     
  10. Dynamicpuncher

    Dynamicpuncher Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    17,625
    38,068
    Jan 14, 2022
    But the length of time is a big context why it can't be compared which you somehow fail to comprehend.
     
    PopPellegrino likes this.
  11. Kiwi Casual

    Kiwi Casual Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,264
    6,730
    Jul 31, 2021
    Why should it be considered when the bulk of that are essentially club level fighters? Is this also a standard you hold any other Heavyweight in the past 25 years to?

    It's an unfair standard and doesn't take into context how boxing has evolved since then.

    The comparison was of their first 14 opponents. You introduced another factor to discredit that, one that doesn't apply to modern heavyweights at all. The point is that as a prospect Itauma is fighting a reasonable level of opposition considering the number of fights that he has had. He'd likely fight Usyk next if offered.
     
  12. The Real Lance

    The Real Lance Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,637
    11,395
    Oct 29, 2012
    It's a flawed and poor comparison to begin with, as Dynamic was showing. Anyone can compare a Ford Escort to a Ford Mustang. Compare a Jr high school basketball player to an NBA player. Comparisons, in order to be valid, should have some level of equality to make them valid and worthy of a comparison.

    A lot of Tyson's early opponents, the ones you call club fighters, may never have accounted to anything. But Tyson's activity is what kept him razor sharp and in great shape year round.

    Ituama is far from that even in his third year as a pro.
     
    PopPellegrino and Dynamicpuncher like this.
  13. Dynamicpuncher

    Dynamicpuncher Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    17,625
    38,068
    Jan 14, 2022
    It isn't good for modern standards either though ?

    Joshua fought 14 professional fights in less than 2 years and won a commonwealth belt.

    It isn't an unfair comparison ? It's adding context.

    Fighting 14 professional fights in less than a year is a whole lot different than fighting 14 professional fights over 3 years.

    Especially when the former won a world title and made multiple title defences in the same amount years as Itauma has been a professional.
     
    Last edited: Mar 31, 2026
    PopPellegrino likes this.
  14. ruffryders

    ruffryders Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,749
    1,235
    Oct 7, 2010
    fighters/managers knew the game then too. If it was as you say, wouldn’t almost all prospects in past or even just Tyson’s era be brought on fighting 2/3 times a month?

    paying 2-3 opponents a month costs money.

    Mike Tyson was an anomaly as he had the financial support and was connected with the right people. Like nepotism
     
  15. Kiwi Casual

    Kiwi Casual Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,264
    6,730
    Jul 31, 2021
    I don't think comparing fighters from different eras is easy to begin with, and I do see your point, but you'll always have "yeah but" if you add in more criteria.

    As for AJ? He's had arguably the biggest backing of any Heavyweight boxer out there today. Compare their 14th fight and tell me who you think is looking more promising.