My List of Welterweights That Would Beat Manny Or Cause Problems

You forgot to mention every legit WW that ever existed.

 

hahahaha... walked into the pac-web

 

you can say that at 140 but at 147 theres some very tough fights along with some id say he looses

but i assume this is in responce to the thread were he listed like every top 10 wleter

 

Mother ****er.
Did I not just teach you the difference between loose and lose?

 

sad sad man

 

How about this....

Hey, hagman1989... no offense dude, but it's loses, not looses....

 

Robinson
Leonard
Duran
Hearns
Delahoya
Mosley
Forrest
Williams
Tito
Napoloes
Whittaker ??
Quartey ??
Gavilan ???
Griffith,Basillio,Rodriguez,Cuevas,Espana,Armstrong,LOpez, all have a 50/50 shot. Im not so sure How Manny would handle a big punching welter. Especially a rangy one like Williams,FOrrest Im postive HEarns flattens him, Prime Oscar would whup him The first 9 imentioned id bet the ranch to beat Pac at Welter. I rate Pac higher than most of these guys PFP but at Welter i can see him getting beat by quite a few.

 

lmfaoooooooooooo@ Luke O..... i got a cramp from laughing so hard

 

Actually, it's "losses". But you guys continue.

 

Depends how your using it. Examples:

Miguel Cotto has 2 losses
Miguel cotto loses to Manny Pac *That is somebody stating it before it happened* If it did happen then it's not proper english. It would be Miguel Cotto HAS LOST to Manny pac.

So either of them are correct. Also, the one guy would be correct if he were to say:

Floyd Mayweather is loose.
I wouldn't see how he'd know that though unless he were riding him of course

 

Are you really that stupid?

I suggest you read his sentence again.

 

Damn dude you are harsh. But yeah, it's "loses" in that case.

 

He could have kept his mouth shut.

 

Yeah, probably should've read that whole convo.