My May Pac Highlights

I think a lot of people are fooled by the commentary, as you said Floyd was missing all the time, when they said he landed it was parried most of the time. Of course he had success it's a fight but for the most part he was missing and unable to effectively use offence. I never seen Floyd fight so scared or ineffectively, the fight overall was very close, the 3rd was definitely Pacs, and I had Pac 7 rounds to 5, at best I can say a draw because round 12 was very tricky to score.

Anyone saying Pac was schooled is just a fanboy unable to objectively score a fight, no fighter was dominant, Floyd looked petrified and was content to run and pot shot, mostly missing, Pac was unable to dart in and throw flurries which I found odd as when he did he had Floyd panicking, since the fight we found out about the shoulder injury so that clears things up quite a bit.

 

:rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl No wonder you're defending him. You and abuffy score alike.

117-111 is a schooling. Of course you think you're an expert by using "fanboy". I leave the scoring to the people who actually know boxing.

 

You mean on the Vegas payroll? Floyds hometown essentially where even the hotels buy him Bugattis because he brings so much business, it's a sad world but it's controlled by money.

Yes judges are so reliable, I mean you only have to look at Garcia recently to see that we shouldn't question judges.

It's funny the people who aren't linked to Floyd all have it a close fight, from former world champions to world class trainers, yet the big media push is to try drown out what we all know, Floyd was very poor and in a lot of peoples eyes lost due to being ineffective offensively.

I admire the people who can score a fight by themselves and not be misled by the media.

Lol @ your laughing emoticons after your first post, just goes to show you don't even believe what you say, conformist.

 

Wasn't it #48's payroll? He paid $4M for a cheering section. Who else did he pay off?

 

You lost any lingering credibility you had with your edit there conformisthi:

 

What are you blabbering about? You scored it Pacquiao 7-5? That's no edit.

 

Your silly rolling laughing emotes added in to try add some weight to your strawman argument, that's a blatantly transparent effort and shows you're a conformist.

Fear is a mental state, what is the best way to avoid fear, be part of a crowd,listen to what the masses say and join in, defend it, preach it,even if it's completely wrong conform to the will of the crowd and anyone on the outside evoke fear as they are different and stand fast with their principles.
:deal

 

117-111 and that's being nice.

4 and 6 were the only rounds Pac won clear as opposed to 8 clear rounds for Mayweather.

 

Yeah I forgot to put them there to emphasize your joke post.

Oh I remember that fear BS about Floyd before the fight. Did you create that stupid thread? :rofl:rofl:rofl

 

Thank you. My eyes aren't lying to me, and I swear I'm trying to look at it as objectively as I can. I scored it with my friend a third time, and she doesn't watch boxing so I had her there to simply help me remain as objective as possible (she's more of a May fan), and we ended up having it 115-115 draw. This was when we went through to in slo-motion. Still, I'm more comfortable settling with 115-113 Floyd. But, I completely understand perspectives of those who say draw, and I even understand Holyfield, Mosely, and Lomanchenko when they think Pacquiao won. I definitely understand their perspectives. I made sure to try and not score it from the mistake that many do, only giving rounds to Floyd's opponents if they do something special. No, that's not accurate. I look at them evenly. If Mayweather sits back a round, I won't reward him it if Pacquiao fails to do 10-punch combination. That isn't fair to him as an ATG.


Pacquiao said, "Floyd didn't control anything. If my weapons were complete, he wouldn't have been moving like that."

I really want to see a rematch, and I'm sure we will, to see if Pacquiao is right. People really need to commend Pac's elusiveness. His defense was incredible for someone coming forward.

I see improvement that could have been made in both fighters, but overall, I felt it was a very close fight. And if Pacquiao truly was inhibited... then... damn.

 

If you think it was a really close fight you truly don't know anything about boxing. This was a very one sided fight. Just leave.

 

You do realize your name alone discredit you, right?

 

Not a bad highlight video of the fight. I may very well go back and re-watch the fight now after thinking it was a snooze fest. Was this a Pac biased video or was it the entire highlight of the fight?

 

:rofl:rofl:rofl What a clown.

Mosley thinks Floyd is Top 5 of all time after his performance

http://www.badlefthook.com/2015/5/5...yweather-is-probably-in-the-top-five-all-time

So it's down to a bible thumper Holyfield and Loma?

 

It wasn't biased. Showed both fighter's highlights from each round pretty well. Pretty much the most action from each round.