# 10 - Arthur ABRAHAM # 9 - Vic DARCHINYAN # 8 - Ricky HATTON # 7 - Rafeal MARQUEZ # 6 - Shane MOSLEY # 5 - Israel VASQUEZ # 4 - Miguel COTTO # 3 - Bernard HOPKINS # 2 - Manny PACQUAIO # 1 - Juan Manuel MARQUEZ
I wouldn't have both Israel Vasqeuz and Rafael Marquez anywhere on my list. These guys has not fought in a year, not to mention that they haven't fought anyone except each other since early 2007.
let me fix it for you..... # 10 - Arthur ABRAHAM # 9 - Vic DARCHINYAN # 8 - Ricky HATTON # 7 - Rafeal MARQUEZ # 6 - Shane MOSLEY # 5 - Israel VASQUEZ # 4 - Miguel COTTO # 3 - Bernard HOPKINS # 2 - Juan Manuel MARQUEZ # 1 - Manny PACQUAIO This content is protected jmm's belt.... This content is protected :good:good after pac-hatton... then... # 10 - Arthur ABRAHAM # 9 - Vic DARCHINYAN # 8 - Ricky HATTON # 7 - Rafeal MARQUEZ # 6 - Shane MOSLEY # 5 - Israel VASQUEZ # 4 - Miguel COTTO # 3 - Bernard HOPKINS # 2 - Juan Manuel MARQUEZ # 1 - Manny PACQUAIO :good
Was it the Miranda fight, the Marquez fight, the Simon fight, or all three that made you think Abraham was an elite fighter?
Maybe, but how do you gauge these fighters against everyone else when they've only fought the same person and no one else in the last two years? They shouldn't be punished for having a trilogy, but neither should they be rewarded that much for it.
Both are regarded as P4P elite. Both were the tops guys in the division. To be the best, you got to beat the best, hence the trilogy. I don't see what the problem is.