My point in all the Chagaev gets beat by such and such threads is...

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by BITCH ASS, Jul 2, 2009.


  1. BITCH ASS

    BITCH ASS "Too Fast" Full Member

    9,440
    5
    Jul 10, 2006
    That he was never a good fighter in the first place.

    He has a style that's tailormade for the amatuers. In the pros, it doesn't work like that.

    He has a Tysonesque style without the skills, athletic ability or fortitude to pull them off.

    Essentially, he is the perfect opponent for a taller, athletic guy, with a solid jab.

    If he wanted his style to be suited more towards the pros, he would have to use his headmovement to get in on the inside and throw combinations, so that his opponent, not he is the one that steps out of the way when confronting a Klitschko like opponent.

    Imagine if Chagaev fought in the 80s.

    He would be picked apart because say what you want about the 80's there were a lot of fluid, boxer punchers, but it's just that Larry Holmes was better than all of them, and then a man named Mike Tyson had the style and athletic ability to beat them all down, and take away their best weapon, their jab.

    Chagaev would easily get outboxed by guys like Tony Tucker, Holmes, and go life and death or end with questionable decisions with a lot of the other guys.

    Just because I say Chagaev is limited and amaetuer, doesn't mean that I'm disrespecting Wladimir because I feel that Wladimir would be competitive in any era, but the same cannot be said about Chagaev who as I said is limited, unathletic, and has an amateur style.

    Honestly, I would have trouble picking Chagaev against a 50 year old Holmes.

    He just doesn't have the tools to get inside the jab, and if he does, he doesn't have the athletic ability or fluidness to pull off combinations, other than of course his 1-2.

    For those of you who don't believe that Haye would be a much more difficult opponent for Klitschko, ya'll really need to reeducated yourself on the skills associated with boxing.
     
  2. Jennifer Love Hewitt

    Jennifer Love Hewitt Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,848
    2,145
    Jul 19, 2004
    Yeah Chagaev suckish. We knew this for quite some time, and by "we" I mean "me and a few other sensible boxing fans".
     
  3. ChrisPontius

    ChrisPontius March 8th, 1971 Full Member

    19,404
    278
    Oct 4, 2005
    And as it is, he's using his head movement to stay on the outside and throw nothing, right? :patsch Watch the Valuev, or actually any of his bouts. He uses head movement to get inside and throw combinations. Just because Wlad didn't allow him to do that, doesn't mean he didn't try. Wladimir is just extremely ****ing hard to land on if you're smaller than 6'3". And even then it's no easy job, as guys his own height (Austin, McCline and Thompson) were all destroyed just the same.

    Then again, if Tyson is the standard to measure someone up with, then 15 guys aside, all those 100.000 boxers of last century were "bums".
     
  4. H .

    H . Boxing Junkie banned

    12,826
    3
    Jan 20, 2007
    You've made some interesting guesses, but you defy the fact that Chagaev was ranked #3 in the heavyweight division in the world. There are over a thousand active heavyweights today. People can downplay the heavyweight division all they want, its had its ups and downs, but anyone highly-ranked had to earn their way there.
    To say Chagaev was never a good fighter in the first place, well, it makes no sense.
     
  5. Rico Spadafora

    Rico Spadafora Master of Chins Full Member

    45,378
    3,791
    Feb 20, 2008
    What will you say if David Haye does not last as long as Chagaev did?

    I mean by your logic it would mean that Chagaev is better than Haye right?

    You are digging a huge hole for yourself on here.
     
  6. gorgse

    gorgse Active Member Full Member

    1,393
    0
    Oct 20, 2008
    You know the saying Style make fights? well this is one. Chageav is no slouch he's damn good and Wlads style that he's using right now makes it nearly impossible for a fighter without height to get inside. Your judging a man on one fight (the only one he has ever lost). In reality I don't see tyson of old doing well against Wlad of now, Tyson didn't deal well with someone with good jab (douglas/Lewis) and would have had fits verses Wlad.
     
  7. the-demon

    the-demon Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,852
    0
    Jul 26, 2008
    at least with haye he comes to fight and at some time he will unload his explosive bombs on that chinny chump vlad...then you watch wlad fall like a sack of ****....:yep
     
  8. BITCH ASS

    BITCH ASS "Too Fast" Full Member

    9,440
    5
    Jul 10, 2006
    50 year old Holmes beats Chagaev.....

    That's what I have to say...
     
  9. BITCH ASS

    BITCH ASS "Too Fast" Full Member

    9,440
    5
    Jul 10, 2006
    Oh ****........you don't say.

    You're telling me that Chagaev was able to barely outspeed one of the slowest boxers of all time?

    Damn, I guess I should rethink my entire analysis...
     
  10. iceman71

    iceman71 WBC SILVER Champion Full Member

    51,687
    23
    Jul 28, 2008
    would have to agree with that
     
  11. ramalinga

    ramalinga Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,229
    8
    May 7, 2007
    Well, slow or not, Valuev's height requires good speed and movement for a 6'1 fighter to land punches on him.

    And this stuff about Haye being a more difficult opponent for Wlad: Haye perhaps may be a better opponent and that is totally unproven. Chagaev would eat Fragomeni and Mormeck alive, opponents that Haye beat in competitive fights. Chagaev beat career heavyweights, Haye beat cruiserweights. Chagaev's opponents against Haye's opponents H2H? No comparsion. Haye has good handspeed alright. His footwork is so - so, his head movement is good but he still got hit well by opponents that Chagaev would easily dominate. Haye's power is unproven at HW.
     
  12. Punisher33

    Punisher33 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    17,407
    8
    Oct 8, 2007
    I used like Chagaev at one time, over 2 years ago when he didn't have more ailments than my 75 yearold grandma. The guys best days are far behind him, his fights against Skelton and Drummond proved that even before he faced Wlad last month how weak he has become.

    I still believe Wlad would of beat the version that used angles and was clever in beating Valuev in april of 07, but it would of not been as one-sided as it was.
     
  13. Lacyace

    Lacyace Forever Knight Full Member

    3,170
    3
    Nov 6, 2005
    Hate to admit on a site that believes every current heavyweight would be undisputed champion in past eras but I never thought Chagaev was all that great. I don't even think Chagaev would have been champ in the late 50s.
     
  14. FlatNose

    FlatNose Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,800
    25
    Feb 16, 2006
    My first time seeing Chagaev was against Wlad. Frankly I was dissapointed. I figured a former world amatuer champion and professional beltholder would know enough to get low and weave himself in close. I'm not buying the story that Wlad "wouldn't let him".
    Chagaev stood right in front of Wlad keeping his head directly in the line of Wlads straight lefts and rights. Where was the strategy, or the plan B that you'd expect from a world class fighter?
    There just wasn't any spirit or vigor in Chagaevs approach. Then, when things weren't going his way, he just quit. Incidently, Chagaev quit, in effect , a few rounds before the fight was stopped. He was just going through the motions, apparently giving up on any thought of winning.
    This seems to be the general mindset of todays typical heavyweight contender. Most aren't even bothering to get in top condition. Once in the ring there doesn't seem to be any great need to win. Certainly the will to win of an Ali, a Frazier, or a Marciano is absent.
    Chagaev made Wlad look like Louis, Johnson, and Ali all rolled up into one. I assure you, if there was one decent heavyweight around that had a mind to really fight to win, Wlads worth would be put in a clearer perspective.
     
  15. BITCH ASS

    BITCH ASS "Too Fast" Full Member

    9,440
    5
    Jul 10, 2006
    Well said. Great post.