My Scorecard - Pacquiao/Marquez 2

agree..... i think marquez won 114-113 but was a hard fight to score...
btw ... i think that in a third fight marquez can won 115-113 or 116-112.... he has pacmans number... and hes coming every fight with a better plan

 

Dude,

there is no third fight yet.... can won?!:verysad :huh

he has pacs numbers... he can also have his email, his fax number


and hes coming every fight with a better plan :verysad :huh

...on the contrary he needs an excellent plan...

By the way, amigo baristain has an unfinished business with Roach.

For the past few years he doesn't have any W's against Roach


Aaaah! I KNOW! Maybe Roach has Baristain's number,...email... fax

 

wtf is this guy smoking?

Certain Manlover Marquez lovers claiming he won the rematch clearly is bad enough, but this is getting ridiculous.

 

At the end of the day mate the vast majority of non-flilipinos and boxing scribes scored it almost identical to you.

There is unfinished business between the two.

 

at the end of the day, it was a very close fight as most fans here scored it 114-113 to either fighter. the judges decided to go one way and it was recorded as such.

this is not the first time very close fights have happened where the decision could've gone to either fighter. just look at the first and second morales-mab fights. jmm has been involved in many close fights. he will get the decision in some while not in others.

 

OBVIOUSLY you haven't answered my question regarding the KD issue on holding on to the ropes

 

i was at the fight live and i swear the "feeling" in the air was that pac won.

after watching the replay at home its safe to say that the fight could have gone either way.

 

he's scared. he might get owned again :yep:good

 

This is really insane Silvermags, I really believe you're making an ass out of yourself!

The fact that so many *******s harp on an issue where JMM neither touched the canvas with his behind or gloves, or even hung on the ropes with his arm or back......but still want to harp that it should have been ruled a knockdown......I dont think there is any question that harping on this issue stems from the fact that the ******* is so insecure with the decision rendered that night.


......its as if the ******* so very badly wants JMM for an instant touching the ropes with his arm to be a knockdown, so that they could feel better about themselves to justify the rotten decision.
.....there is really no other way for me to explain it.

I've asked for examples of ref calling such a thing as a fighter briefly grazing the ropes called a knockdown, but all I've gotten was examples of fighter falling back heavily onto the ropes and having the ropes break their fall......like the Toney vs Jones example where Toney lost his footing much like JMM, but in the Toney case, his whole body leading with his back, went crashing onto the ropes, the ropes breaking his fall.
....a completely different situation.

I'm done with this Silvermags!
.....you cant give me one freaking example of a ref calling a knockdown when the fighters arm or glove briefly and grazingly touch the ropes without the fighter wrapping his glove or arm around those ropes, as JMM clearly was'nt wrapping himself to the ropes to prevent a fall.


This topic has been debated before, and you insist on asking the same old questions of the past.




There was a thread done not too long ago where I and others made some exellent points on the matter.

I dont expect a ******* to even begin to absorb the logic, but heres the link to it anyways.........

http://www.eastsideboxing.com/forum/showthread.php?t=96163

I'd recommend you get educated by reading the whole thread......paying particular attention to post #59 which details alot of what you might be asking for in this thread.

 

I really want to read what noob and knuckle headed comment Silvermags will post in response. :yep

 

Save yourself the suspense, the man is a broken record!:!:

 

like you?:yep

 

:rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl:good

 

Divac, how can one be insecure w/ victory ruling which is already moot and academic? *******s (which is btw a badge of honor these days) are just responding to every threads claiming JMM's victory or robbery and that uncounted KD when JMM leaned on the ropes to prevent a fall is just one of their ready arsenals. Remember and take note ot this: it is you, JMMorons, who have been posting flammatory threads almost everyday claiming that this close fight was a robbery. Was it? Tell me, honestly. Wasn't it a close fight that anyone can win it? Do you think Pac performed much better than the 1st fight? Was Marquez not knocked down? Wasn't this KD the clincher for Pac to win by a slim margin? Why can't you move on, JMMorons? I think we should now ask Pac to spare you of lingering pain after a fight. Tell me, what should we do to help you appease that pain and anguish from the loss of your idol? Perhaps, if all my fellow *******s will agree, we'll just ignore your whinings and leave you suspended in animation as you wallow in despair and self-pity. :yep:hey:rofl:hi: And for Pac, I would suggest he stop fighting a whining loser Marquez anymore. :hi: