My Scorecard - Pacquiao/Marquez 2

Every question you just slinged out has been answered numerous times in this forum......look for them Soriano.......at the moment some of you *******s are harping on the JMM touched the rope issue, and that it should be a knockdown.......I'm debating the issue logically, and you throw that garbage post above this one out of the blue......

.....for what reason? Is it that you dont want to answer the points I've made in regards to that third round grazing of the ropes?

Spare me a response, I no longer feel like I'm debating *******s, but more like ******s!:-(

 

Now I know why you're overly passionate on this issue about Marquez's holding on the ropes to break a fall? Because if you can't prove your contention it will only solidy the decision of the two judges to give the nod to Pacquiao. But who are you anyway to say that Pac lost and Marquez was cheated? Were you there in Mandalay Bay resort last March 15 to withness fully what was happening in the ring? Or were you just in the comfort of your home holding on to your beer and biases? Why should you be believed? What credentials do you have to declare who is the the winner and loser of this fight? You even declared that the judges were corrupt to justify that Marquez was cheated? What proof do you have? It boils down to your credibility, Divac, whether you should be believed or nor? Not your kilometric posts which are loaded w/ bias and nuthuggery.

Anyway, as I've said, it is already water under the bridge. I suggest for everyone to be at peace with one another, let's now stop this endless bickerings about a fight which could be judged other way. After all is said and done, it is still the official records of the fight that count, and not the opinions of anyone whichever side he is on.,

 

I had Marquez beating Pac both times.

 

I and the judges saw Pac won both fights by SD. So that cancelled both of us out and left the judges as the ultimate arbiter.

 

Marquez won the fight. He also won the first in my eyes. Manny doesn't do too well against those counterpunchers.

 

Thread like this will never stop coming, that's how close the fight was. That fight will be talked about 50 years from now and people will never agree on who really won. It's the chicken and egg argument that ends up with nothing but hatred towards each other.

 

Marquez won according to you but pac won according to others, so what gives?

 

This content is protected

This content is protected

Yeah, I agree w/ you. Manny did not do well enough w/ these KDs.

This content is protected

After the KD in the 10th, Marquez got dazed and followed Manny to his corner. :rofl:rofl:rofl

What counterpunches? :nono

 

Koki Kameda

 

Koki Kameda calls himself the manny pacquiao of japan. Waiting for the next pinoy boxer to call himself the koki kameda of the philippines.

 

Watch out for "Marvelous Pacquiao", a Pinoy prospect.

 

Marvelous Pacquiao? must be some bum with a weak chin. :yep

 

It was a close one but I give the edge to Marquez. Boxing is scored on a round to round basis and that was only one round.... I think it was fairly clear that Marquez won a majority of the others. Same can be said about the first fight.

 

I think what gives is that the ones who scored it for Pacman are wrong. That is just my opinion though and anyone can feel free to disagree.

 

According to you. Okay, I'll accept that. :smoke

Cheers! :good