My take on Bradley / Pacquaio

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Temiken, Jun 18, 2012.


  1. Thatman

    Thatman No respond troll pactards banned

    5,744
    0
    Jun 10, 2012
    They should have taken action after Marquez Pacquiao 3. That was just as clear of a robbery as the Bradley Pacquiao fight.
     
  2. prelude

    prelude Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,924
    7
    Nov 12, 2010
    My take on you: ******
     
  3. SweetScience

    SweetScience Accuracy is the key! Full Member

    3,403
    5
    Mar 25, 2007
    Please read, I mentioned writers not boxers. Are Ricky Hatton and Wayne McCullough writers? I dont think so.
     
  4. SweetScience

    SweetScience Accuracy is the key! Full Member

    3,403
    5
    Mar 25, 2007
    And I agree with the OP. I watched the fight from the Top Rank feed and those guys were as neutral as they could possibly be unlike those people from the HBO feed who were riding Pac's nuts all night long. Every missed punch Pac threw whilst Bradley was ducking had the crowd creaming in their pants which affected some people's judgement as to why they argue why Pac won. First time I watched it I scored it 8-4 Bradley but the second time I watched it I gave it 7-5 Bradley. Deal with it people, Pac lost fair and square he wasnt robbed. Flurrying for the last 30 seconds of a round and then missing doesnt win you the round.
     
  5. Rewatched wit out sound and in hidef Bradley was controlling everything and won 8-4.
    Compubox was fixed but judges were flawless
     
  6. Gander Tasco

    Gander Tasco Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,438
    24
    Mar 13, 2010
    :lol:
     
  7. cuchulain

    cuchulain Loyal Member Full Member

    35,456
    10,439
    Jan 6, 2007
    You could have added a round each for being SLICK and BLACK,

    That would have left him needing only one more round to have it in the bag.