My theory about World Title belts

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by gooners!!, Feb 2, 2010.


  1. gooners!!

    gooners!! Boxing Junkie banned

    10,166
    1
    Jan 15, 2009
    My theory about World Title belts

    Is there something to be said for the fact that the belts dont seem to mean **** to the established fighters anymore and that the belts they would normally hold and reign with are abandoned and picked up by prospects who are not far enough along into their development to be able to defend it against the guys a so called World Champion should be defending his belt against.

    Do you think there is any truth to that ? All i hear these days when you criticize a young World Champion for not fighting dangerous opponents he possibly should be fighting is " give him time to develop he is only young " now i always assumed when your a World Champion that kinda philosophy goes out the window and that your in tough more often not and that thats how it should be if you hold a strap.

    Do you remember Jimmy Jacobs saying ..........when you get to a certain level you must realize you cant go backwards?
     
  2. zoo

    zoo Active Member Full Member

    1,424
    2
    Sep 14, 2006
    The belts are bull**** and they always have been, I remember when WBO used to be bogus but now they are considered legit. Stupid. The great fighters know that belts are just that, belts. Greatness is acheived by beating great fighters, not by collecting green, red or whatever color waistbands.
     
  3. robpalmer135

    robpalmer135 Obsessed with Boxing banned

    28,342
    0
    Jun 29, 2007
    esb rankings are the best
     
  4. pare

    pare Active Member Full Member

    626
    2
    Oct 20, 2008
    you're probably right. belts used to mean you're the best in the world. now they are stepping stones for getting to fight the best in the world.
     
  5. Rhino718

    Rhino718 M.O.B. Full Member

    3,739
    1
    Apr 29, 2008
    the problem is any one whos ever put on gloves dreams of being a world champion, no matter whos belt it is. Then the fact that no one is willing to pay 3-5 santioning fees to be considered undisputed champ. :-(
     
  6. Davies

    Davies Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,829
    4
    Jul 8, 2008
    X2 :good
     
  7. Knives7

    Knives7 Boxing Addict banned

    7,196
    1
    Jan 24, 2009
    :deal
    Co-sign!
     
  8. TheDon

    TheDon KO Artist Full Member

    3,434
    1
    Apr 19, 2008
    the orgs are a joke and as soon as boxers and the media realise this the belts will stop existing. events like the super 6 will stop all this **** if taken up in other weight classes. i dont even know which belts the fighters carry, only how many points they have
     
  9. freelaw

    freelaw Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,143
    916
    Nov 17, 2007
    Co-co-sign.

    Belts are joke.

    I'm dreaming about that there is only ONE belt in each division though...

    Or else- there are let's say- 3 world title belts at all - light, middle and heavy- each including a few close divisions combined. Wouldn't that be something?...
     
  10. Abdullah

    Abdullah Boxing Junkie banned

    8,257
    13
    Dec 2, 2008
    This is the real belt.


    <------
     
  11. Above Deck

    Above Deck Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,887
    177
    Nov 10, 2008
    Shane Mosely wants to collect them all!!
     
  12. loginistooshort

    loginistooshort Active Member Full Member

    1,010
    0
    Jan 30, 2010
    This content is protected
    Belts? :think ...Belts! :good:good
     
  13. smitty86

    smitty86 Member Full Member

    106
    0
    Apr 11, 2009
    I agree
     
  14. Kid Cuba

    Kid Cuba Boxing Junkie banned

    7,712
    0
    Feb 16, 2009
    Out of all the "world title" orgs I think the IBO has the best ranking system.