My Thoughts On Glazkov/Scott And The HW Scene

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Vysotsky, Feb 24, 2013.


  1. Vysotsky

    Vysotsky Boxing Junkie banned

    12,797
    11
    Oct 14, 2009
    This content is protected


    This content is protected


    This content is protected


    This content is protected
     
  2. Vysotsky

    Vysotsky Boxing Junkie banned

    12,797
    11
    Oct 14, 2009
    This content is protected


    This content is protected


    This content is protected


    This content is protected

    This content is protected

    This content is protected
     
  3. Berliner

    Berliner Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,114
    0
    Feb 14, 2013
    What did Glazkov to win this fight?
    He was very uneffectiv and landed almost nothing on Scott! Glazkov found no way to really get into Scott or land something big on Scott. Scott on the otherhand had his jab landing many times and also some power shots.
    Glazkov was the aggresor in this fight and you have to give him credit for that but he was just not effectiv with it. And in order to give points for "aggresion" it has to be effectiv... Glazkov only landed 27% of his punches!
    It was closer than many say it was (because I give Glazkov credit because he always started the action). But boxing is about landing punches while not getting hit and Scott was just the better and faster boxer this night. Landing almost 50 punches more than Glazkov
    It says all when Glazkov only gets a draw on his stage! They would give him the win but it was just not enough no win this fight so they gave him a draw. He can be very lucky about that!

    If Scott only had some power in his hands he would be the biggest threat to the Klitschkos!
     
  4. Jack

    Jack Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    22,560
    67
    Mar 11, 2006
    "Aggression" is not the criteria for scoring a fight, "effective aggression" is. Glazkov was busy and threw plenty of nice looking punches but he didn't land anywhere near enough shots to win the bulk of the rounds. Scott made him miss with ease a lot of the time and left Glazkov looking lost.

    Personally, I'd have it 7-2-1 in favour of Scott. Easily the better fighter.
     
  5. lewishamboy

    lewishamboy Styles Impetuous Full Member

    9,101
    0
    Jul 15, 2007
    Malik got robbed straight up.
     
  6. bremen

    bremen Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,843
    196
    Oct 11, 2010
    Good analysis. It wasn't a robbery as much as BJ Flores was trying to sell it.
     
  7. bremen

    bremen Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,843
    196
    Oct 11, 2010
    Glazkov landed enough power punches while Scott was living off the jab.
     
  8. StillWill

    StillWill Dr. Eisenfaust Full Member

    3,265
    12
    Jul 12, 2010
  9. Vysotsky

    Vysotsky Boxing Junkie banned

    12,797
    11
    Oct 14, 2009
    Well pretty much everything i have to say about this fight is in my initial post. What did Glazkov do? He consistantly landed more power shots than Scott in almost every round.

    I don't really care what the punch stats say as iv watched it twice very carefully for myself. As for all these supposed jabs Malik landed go ahead and tell me a single round where he landed more than 10 jabs to Glazkov's head, seriously watch it and tell me a round. From the 4th on he didnt throw or land his jab with any greater frequency than Glazkov and the vast majority of landed punches for both guys came at mid range during exchanges. Its amazing how some horrible commentary can completely distort peoples perception of what happened in a fight.

    A draw is a completely valid score but having it 2 points for either guy is fair. Anyone claming it was a robbery or schooling is incomprehensible to me. Its one of the most even fights i have seen in terms of action and skills and was beautiful to watch.
     
  10. Uncle Roger

    Uncle Roger Boxing Addict banned

    5,945
    0
    Oct 12, 2011


    I've seen two Ortiz fights recently (vs Mendoza and Butler). He's definitely an interesting prospect.

    Have you seen any of his other fights? I can't seem to find any, so I'd love some insight.
     
  11. PityTheFool

    PityTheFool Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,192
    6
    Oct 18, 2011
    All I know is yet again, I was robbed of a healthy win at the bookies because of bad judging.
    It's one thing to have a disgraceful vcash total, but now all these shockers are adding up to what would've been a good few rupees in my pocket.
     
  12. EuroBot

    EuroBot Guest

    Not like you have an agenda or anything.
     
  13. Boxingfan2

    Boxingfan2 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,755
    3,045
    Mar 11, 2012
    I had it 96-94 Scott, it was much closer than the broadcasting crew saw it.
    Every time one of Scotts jabs grazed Glazkovs head they went crazy while never pointing out Glazkovs work to the body and him cutting off the ring effectively in the 2nd half of the fight.
     
  14. SouthpawJab

    SouthpawJab On his way up!! 4-0!! Full Member

    8,781
    20
    May 26, 2011
    Exactly :patsch
     
  15. JohnH

    JohnH Guest

    That's how I scored it too. There was no robbery.