My thoughts on the career of JMM

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by lufcrazy, Aug 9, 2011.


  1. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    80,694
    21,310
    Sep 15, 2009
    Obviosuly boxing is a subjective sport so I watched all of his controversially scored fights and made my own judgement on who should have won them.

    First off I think it is impossible to rate JMM accurately unless you dig out some of his old fights. As a featherweight this man was truly great. Here's my rbr of the norwood, john and pac 1 fights.

    M-N

    1: 10-9 - cagey first round, norwood stalking with his slippery stance and marquez jabbing off the back foot later in the round M gets a couple of decent combos in.
    2: 8-10 - beautiful counter left by norwood dropping M early on. norwood lands some good lefts later in the round also.
    3: 10-9 - norwood fighting very negative this round and still being caught with clean shots by M.
    4: 10-9 - marquez again chasing N round the ring and still landing some good combos on him. N lands a flashy 1-2 but aside from that did nothing of note.
    5: 10-9 - again N being very negative, lands a good combo early on but then for the rest of the round retreats and still gets tagged regularly by M.
    6: 10-9 - another frustrating round, norwood thinking he can win by landing one clean shot and avoiding everything marquez throws at him, not realising that M's shots are still getting through.
    7: 9-10 - norwood alnded some cracking counters this round whilst slipping the majority of M's punches.
    8: 10-9 - good round by marquez, landing his right hand consistently throughout the round, denied a clear kd.
    9: 10-8 - good round by marquez again, landing good combos and dropping norwood just before the bell.
    10: 10-9 - marquez again dictating the action, norwood fighting a very defensive fight but still being caught by marquez.
    11: 9-10 - norwood lands some good shots on marquez and slips out of the way of most of the return fire.
    12: 10-9 - very scruffy round, norwood lands some eye catching lefts but for the most part is on the back foot being tagged as he tries slipping.

    116-110

    Pac-Marquez 1

    1: 10-6 - we all know the story here, completely one sided round
    2: 10-9 - another rough round for marquez as pac found success with his left. jmm fired back with a couple of combos but for the most part was on the back foot under attacke
    3: 9-10 - good round for marquez who was able to stand his ground and time pacman on the way in to good effect.
    4: 9-10 - really close roung, pac started well, jmm adjusted well and finished slightly stronger rocking pac with a good right hand just before the bell.
    5: 9-10 - great round with marquez landed some huge solid shots that pac walked right onto
    6: 9-10 - very good marquez round, by this point he has pac completely sussed so much so that pac looked scared to throw towards tyhe end of the round for fear he'd be countered.
    7: 10-9 - big improvement by pac who picked his shots much better using spped and range to pick marquez off.
    8: 10-9 - a good display of speed and range by pacman here as he picks his shots brilliantly to win another round.
    9: 9-10 - very close round, pac's speed gives him a good finish as he reverts back to pot shotting but the first 2 minutes were controlled by marquez's timing and good body work.
    10: 10-9 - pac uses the 1-2 to great effect and even tho marquez has some good moments it isn't enough to negate pac's quick accurate work.
    11: 9-10 - very good round with the two exchanging big shots but marquez coming out on top.
    12: 9-10 - good finish by marquez who times pac with big strong combos in a fantastic finish to a fantastic fight.

    113-112

    footnote, it's interesting to note that using the old scoring system marquez wins 7 rounds to 5, but the 3 knockdowns have ultimately won it for pac on my cards.



    M-J

    1: 10-9 - M landing all the clean shots, J is very ineffective
    2: 10-9 - more of the same great right hand by M at the start snaps J's head back.
    3: 9-10 - decent round by M, holding the centre and landing good combos. J did land a good shot about a minute in and had a good last half minute this round the better shots came form J.
    4: 10-9 - another good effort by John, but again the cleaner work is coming from M, J fought well on the back foot but M pressured well at times with good body work.
    5: 10-9 - brilliant display by marquez so far, he's consistently coming out on top of all the exchanges, forcing john to back away, miss, come in and get beaten to the punch.
    6: 9-10 - better round by John who timed marquez well and was able to beat him to the punch and get out of range afterwards.
    7: 10-9 - good work by marquez here, he is more intelligent with his work and shows good aggression backing john up. john is not able to time marquez and it makes me think juan took round 5 off.
    8: 10-9 - good work by both fighters here, but more of it again coming from marquez, his combination punching is very good and john can't handle it too well.
    9: 10-9 - good exchanges in this round, John seems content with the work he's doing but he's constantly being beaten to the punch and is coming out second best in the majority of exchanges
    10: 9-9 - M deducted a point for hitting marquez with a body shot on the belt and got caught by a flush combo with about 30 seconds left, that aside he controlled the round with a superior display of combo throwing and counter punching
    11: 8-10 - M deducted another point for a body shot on the belt. J's defence was quite solid in this round and he landed some very good shots on a clearly frustrated M who looked quite sloppy
    12: 9-10 - M starts really strong in this round but after about the minute mark John starts to out box him to a good finish for the final round.

    114-112

    The only man to beat him at featherweight by my cards was pacman and that is as a result of the 3 knockdowns.

    From 96-2006 this man was a top 10 featherweight scoring victories over:

    julio gervacio
    agapito sanchez
    alfred kotey
    juan cabrera
    freddie norwood
    daniel jimenez
    robbie pedan
    manuel medina
    derrick gainer
    orlando salido
    victor polo
    chris john

    in his loss to pac he won 7 of the rounds and bar that trio of knockdowns he'd have beaten him as well.

    I think at this weight jmm had what it takes to beat hamed, mab and morales and it's a crying shame the fights never came off as marquez had the ability and possible opponents to be a true great at feather weight.

    After his move up he fought a good trio of opponents: mab, juarez and pacman. I had him beating mab and losing the pacman fight by 1 point as a reult of the knockdown

    mab-jmm
    1: 10-9 -
    2: 10-9 -
    3: 9-10 -
    4: 9-10 -
    5: 9-10 -
    6: 9-10 -
    7: 8-10 -
    8: 10-9 -
    9: 9-10 -
    10: 9-10 -
    11: 9-10 -
    12: 10-9 -

    111-116 * with the kd in the 7th it would be 113-114


    pac-marquez 2

    1: 9-10 - good start by marquez contolling behing his jab and keeping pac at bay with good counter shots, pac had brief success in the last minute but not enough to edge it.
    2: 10-9 - good start to the round by pac and for the most part he seemed in control until a huge finish by jmm in the last 10 seconds, but still 10 seconds don't win a round.
    3: 10-8 - even round until the knockdown and a big finish by pac
    4: 10-9 - not much in this round but i feel pac landed more consistently
    5: 9-10 - much better timing and ring generalship by marquez this round
    6: 9-10 - close round but I think marquez won it with good timing and efective punching
    7: 10-9 - best round of the night so far with plenty of echanges but i think pac got the best of it landing the better shots
    8: 9-10 - good finish by pac but marquez was in control for the vast majority of the round forcing pac on the back foot.
    9: 10-9 - good round by pac rwally tasking it to marquez this round with a good display of aggression.
    10: 10-9 - razor close round could go either way, pac's left seemed to be landing too regularly this round and it was causing jmm problems so i gave him the edge
    11: 9-10 - another razor close round with marquez getting the dge this time as I thought his shots were better timed, better placed and had more effect
    12: 9-10 - very good final round, marquez stood his ground a bit better and landed some good shots on pac.

    115-114

    Then at lightweight he defied the odds to defeat casamayor, diaz (x2) and katsidis.

    By my reckoning he has beaten 18 men who have been ranked in the top 10 at one time or another; two of those, john and salido, are currently top 3 featherweights.

    The only man to conclusively beat him in my books is floyd mayweather in what was a step to far and an apparent ceiling on his legacy. however with this upcoming fight he has a chance, imo, to surpass chavez, sanchez and morales and to gain recognition as the greatest mexican of all time. If he does somehow beat marquez he'll have been the premiere fighter in an amazing 4 divisions.

    I'm not really a fan of marquez I just decided to look into some of his more controversial fights and the more I saw the more I appreciated. In his era I think the only man who could beat him between feather and lightweight is pacman and only then with the aid of knockdowns.

    It's gonna go down as a shame he didn't get to pit his skills against hamed, mab and morales as I thinm he'd have beaten all 3 and sealed his legacy already rather than still at the age of 36 fighting for recognition that his talents merit.

    I know this has been a long post but I'd advise people to watch the fights that jmm failed to win and after watching all 4 it is very difficult to announce him the loser. He was flat out robbed by norwood and I believe the John fight was a robbery. There is room to say he could have been called a winner agianst pac both times but I scored him a 1 point loser on both occasions and had he been able to stay on his feet for all 24 rounds I think he'd come out the superior man.

    How do you view this man? should he be being discussed alongside the great mexicans I've mentioned? or is he just one of boxing's good but not great fighters?
     
  2. Bogotazo

    Bogotazo Amateur Full Member

    31,381
    1,133
    Oct 17, 2009
    As a JMM fan, I appreciate you taking the time out to try and objectively assess his career. It really is a shame his physical prime didn't see fights with the big names until later, but he's making up for it with his longevity. He is one of the few Mexicans to win championships in different weight classes, and his career below lightweight alone qualifies him for the Hall of Fame. His longevity in knocking out every top lightweight that has risen through the ranks up until now is icing on the cake. He definitely deserves to be discussed in the same breath as Morales, Barrera, and Pacquiao. Critics say he never dominated his opposition below welterweight, while I say he was never decisively beaten and was robbed a good couple of times. The man is truly great, and I hope his career is more closely examined in the future by those who only see the wins on the surface of his last 6 years in the sport.

    Thanks for the scores and thoughts.
     
  3. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    80,694
    21,310
    Sep 15, 2009

    yes what he achieved at Lightweight is definitely evening it out a bit. I think at feather only pac was able to beat him and that's because pac scored 3 kd's. i think the likes of mab, em and hamed would have lost decisions to marquez and then he'd be much better appreciated.

    to be fighting for a legacy at his age is a shame and i hope he can overcome the odds and defeat pacman, i just don't see it happening.
     
  4. saul_ir34

    saul_ir34 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,549
    0
    May 6, 2007
    JMM is a fighter who if he had not been avoided in his physical prime would probably end up being mentioned as one of the best FW ever. However the guy is still fighting elite guys at 37.
     
  5. BarraBod

    BarraBod Member Full Member

    148
    0
    Mar 13, 2011
    I always thought the man was great, and I also thought the only person to beat him was PBF! I still think he can do it against pacquaio on the 12/NOV, he might have lost some speed but his countering is still there as he has shown, which will cause pacquiao plenty of problems, lets just hope he can stay on his feet! :p
     
  6. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    80,694
    21,310
    Sep 15, 2009
    agree 100%
     
  7. Uncle Rico

    Uncle Rico Loyal Member Full Member

    39,748
    3
    Jun 28, 2009
    I agree. I think his exploits above featherweight, more than warrants his place alongside Barrera and Morales.
     
  8. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    80,694
    21,310
    Sep 15, 2009
    definitely people forget how much of an underdog he was vs diaz in the first fight "he struggled against casa and diaz is just too big for him" etc. and it's worth reminding people how good a fight that actually was!
     
  9. hent

    hent Member Full Member

    200
    0
    Jun 30, 2011
    JMM was not avoided. The Norwood, Pacquiao and John losses were not robberies either. If you were objective about those fights you can see that there is a clear clase for him losing those fights. Against John and Norwood he was ineffective as he was the one who was made to be the agressor. Also against MAB he was lucky to get the decison.

    The only live opponent he fought in the 90s was Norwood. Morales, Hamed and MAB had no reason to duck JMM. He wasnt proven as a top fighter into later in his career. When he did get offered fights with Morales, Hamed and an immediate Pacquiao rematch he turned them down. He was very reluctant to fight Hamed saying that he was tricky and the only way he could win was by KO. JMM only has himself and Nacho to blame for his poor management.
     
  10. PowerPuncher

    PowerPuncher Loyal Member Full Member

    42,723
    264
    Jul 22, 2004
    I think I had him losing to Norwood, but had him beating Pacquaio twice close but clear, master class performances. His FW reign is seriously underrated,

    Pac - ATG imo he won

    Gainer - was very tricky very good bordering A Class. Excellent performance Gainer beat Norwood and Kelly

    Norwood - excellent A Class imo

    Chris John - excellent A Class imo

    Polo - very good, skilled boxer - deserved to take the titles against Scott Harrison and Chacon fights. His Gainer was also an SD - JMM dominated

    Medina - 5 time champ, very good

    Salido - just beat JuanMa recently, dominated by JMM

    These are all the guys Hamed, MAB, morales, Pacman didn't fight, tricky skilled FWs

    SFW

    MAB - ATG
    Pac - ATG
    Juarez - probably won the first MAB fight, top contender dominated

    LW

    Casamayor - bordeline ATG, he had 1 bad performance (not quite the robbery some make it to be) but was lineal but past his best, great KO

    Diaz x2 - many considered him no1 pre Campbell, young bull, bigger, great dominant wins for JMM

    Katsidis - solid contender, dominated bar a KD

    ATG 3 weight Champ, I think I rank him over MAB/Morales/Arguello and maybe Pacquaio for that matter. I hope he beats Pacquaio but hes now 38 and the weight doesn't favour him
     
  11. hent

    hent Member Full Member

    200
    0
    Jun 30, 2011
    :lol:
     
  12. horst

    horst Guest

    :lol: An exercise in how to twist every fight into being rosier than it actually was. Some real bias/affection at work here alright.
     
  13. El Bujia

    El Bujia Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,744
    78
    Apr 4, 2010
    That's PP for ya.
     
  14. PowerPuncher

    PowerPuncher Loyal Member Full Member

    42,723
    264
    Jul 22, 2004
    Highlight what you actually disagree with, Marquez was fighting on the 'who wants them' circuit until recently. John, Polo, Norwood were top class, so was Gainer. There's a reason MAB and Morales were steered clear of them. Obviously most of you just watch your HBO golden boys and ignore the rest
     
  15. horst

    horst Guest

    :yikes No... no... make it stop... someone....