Sugar Ray Robinson at around 316, then? Approximately? One thing though. Is it possible to see your top few first? I want a relative comparison just so people don't say I immensely overrate Burley. I'm thinking I might have him higher at middleweight than even you!
Mine is a God awful mess at the moment, but probably the only guys I would have ahead of Burley would be Monzon, Sugar Ray Robinson and Greb...Hopkins and Haggler mooching about around there too.
He's my rough Top 10: 1. Charles 2. Tunney 3. Moore 4. Langford 5. Spinks 6. Jones Jr 7. Foster 8. Conn 9. Loughran 10. Fitz
This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected
You can expect it to be shot down when you have a mediocrities like Tarver and Andries above fighters like Galindez and Saad.Or Hopkins who has barely done anything of note in the division and is as mickey duff would have said...a ****ing old man. Limited fighters like Hill and irrelevant WBO legend Daruisz in the top twenty...c'mon. I don't really like criticising lists when i can't be bothered to make them myself anymore, but i really think you have to go back to the drawing board on this one.
Foster sooner or later? That weak-chinned slow clumsy not particularly skilled or clever dude will do no better than Richard Hall. If somebody gets stopped there, it's gonna be Foster.
Daruisz was THE World Champion for a very long time. Never undersatood the fuss about Galindez; Tarver is underrated because he is disliked. Andries was amazing, to think what he was in 82 to what he became is beyond words IMO, I may be in a minority, but I do not care if I overrate him, he deserves it for all those who are to closed minded to put him on their list. Hill is another fighter who gets too little credit.
Overrated Bum Verses Roy Jones... That would be in Juniors dreams, as he would be fighting his mirror image.
This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected Moore is not a reasonable pick for #1 in my view, given that another candidate - there can't be much between them - beat him on no less than three occasions.
I actually have the exact same names in my top ten although slightly different order I feel Moore should be above Tunney he beat better fighters at the weight and didn't avoid anyone (Kid Norfolk and Jack Delaney he should have had a rematch with Loughran too.) My top ten: 1. Ezzard Charles 2. Archie Moore 3. Sam Langford 4. Gene Tunney 5. Billy Conn 6. Bob Foster 7. Michael Spinks 8. Tommy Loughran 9. Roy Jones Jr 10. Harold Johnson
Nice, Minotauro. I agree it is reasonable to have Moore above Tunney for sure - it's a tight one. As I said in the original post, I feel Moore fought better fighters but Tunney has the better wins. That's what's done it for me.