My unbiased scoring of the Pac vs Marquez HBO recast.

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by RafaelGonzal, Nov 19, 2011.


  1. Sunchild78

    Sunchild78 Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,721
    50
    Sep 25, 2009
    After watching the recast, I changed my decision from a robbery to a draw. Marquez didn't dominate for a clear victory, but did get the cleaner punches. The judge who scored it 116 to 112 was paid off. Max Kellerman, Manny Stewart as well as countless others are either changing there vote to a draw or sticking with Marquez as being the winner. Max Kellerman also came to the realization of Pac getting spanked by Mayweather, which is the obvious that any unbiased fan can see. None the less it would be fun to watch.
     
  2. PACQUIAO WON case close.
    This content is protected

    [ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BYC2qTYfSHs[/ame]
     
  3. Diggersan

    Diggersan Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,388
    2
    Mar 14, 2010
    I had it a draw too. too close to call decisively.
     
  4. ecdrm15

    ecdrm15 Boxing Addict Full Member

    7,264
    94
    Apr 30, 2008
    Draw. Too many close rounds
     
  5. igor_otsky

    igor_otsky Undefeated Full Member

    14,283
    4
    Jul 26, 2008

    This content is protected
     
  6. clean effective punching right here
    [ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BYC2qTYfSHs[/ame]
     
  7. puga_ni_nana

    puga_ni_nana Dempsey Roll Full Member

    41,814
    5
    Apr 14, 2007
    he landed them clearly around the middle art of the fight especially round 5 but throughout the fight is subject to contention. watching the replays of the slow-mo, i was surprised to see pacquiao hitting shots that i thought was not clean and hard.

    effectivity of the punch is another subjective thing since both guys actually nullified each other so as not to commit punches more than they could have against other lesser opponents. some would say that marquez being the counter-puncher most throughout the fight has imposed more while pacquiao being the aggressor for the most part of the fight and being more active has dictated the pace.
     
  8. duranimal

    duranimal Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,611
    31
    Jan 4, 2009
    I agree, I actually flew over for the fight & had a fantastic $1200 view & being part of the event yer can easily be deceived. I had it for JMM on the night but now i've had a chance to watch it on DVD (Volume turned down) i was shocked at the amount of punches from JMM i thought landed actually missed by a street. But with the roar of the crowd & bad biased commentary you can easily see this as a robbery but it was'nt no robbery. I've rescored it like you for pac by 3 rounds but it's also an easy 114/114 seeing the rounds were evenly contested & it all about what you liked.

    It's always going to be that way with these 2 even if they fought 100 times it's always going to be a split-em. I'am a massive fan of JMM & i felt as sorry as hell for him but IMHO he let it slip away in the final 4 rounds. The brit commentary was absolutly atrocious & i had to stop the DVD & go back & start agin with the volume low & a whole different fight panned out before my eyes. NO ROBBERY just another case of the world now expecting to much from pacquiao & i'd use the Leonard/Hagler fight as an example, just because the underdogs still there & upright don't mean his winning.

    I'am one of the few on here that rubbished the claims by the clowns here who said it would be a blow out, it was always going to be rounds 25/36 due to the styles & if anything the incresed weight was to pac's disadvantege & to JMM advantage & if people can't understand that then they should **** off back to watching MMA.
     
  9. sdsfinest22

    sdsfinest22 Pound 4 Pound Full Member

    37,732
    1
    Apr 19, 2007
    Pac got his a$$ whooped-most of these clowns were sayin pac would ko him inside of 6.

    Pac got a boxing lesson-more than 85 percent of people believe this was a draw for manny pacquiao at the best and more than half of those 85 percent had marquez winning.

    Lmfao at the pathetic 12 percent who voted for manny.

    Pac got a gift decision.

    Floyd would knock him inside of 7 rounds..maybe 8.
     
  10. sthomas

    sthomas Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,002
    6
    Jul 14, 2007

    This is a valid and true statement, and Pac. still won because he landed consistantly more punches throughout the fight. Marquez most effective punches IMO were thrown in round 5, but it was still a 10-9 round.
     
  11. Uncle Roger

    Uncle Roger Boxing Addict banned

    5,945
    0
    Oct 12, 2011
    This thead is filled with the biggest idiots of ESB. This should be merged with ESB Tambyan.
     
  12. Gonzarelli

    Gonzarelli Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,063
    1
    Apr 29, 2009
    It's never a good sign when the thread starts with "My unbiased...".

    7-4-1 for PAC:lol:
     
  13. timeout

    timeout Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    18,717
    3,531
    Jun 15, 2010
    its pronounced
    "you dont know **** about baaaxing".:patsch
     
  14. RealBoxing

    RealBoxing Kill The Nonsense Full Member

    2,783
    0
    Feb 15, 2009



    Exactly. :deal


    Keeping it real. Jmm won 9 rounds. Pac only won 3 maybe a 4th but thats
    max. Very easily seen. Look at all the polls everywhere, professional fighters, and most medias opinions. Everyone has Marquez winning.
    These PacRoids still trying to convince people. Give it up already.


    It was a clear Marquez win. Thats all
    there is to it. :deal
     
  15. AnotherFan

    AnotherFan Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,221
    2
    Dec 20, 2010
    No doubt. Ask the judges ...

    Try with slow mo.