Myke tyson(who faced holyfield) vs ron lyle(the version who knocked down foreman)

this test is an a complete and absolute lie, plain and simple, me AND NOBODY never saw the real tests, just a rumor on a forum, it is a lie.
and i have a gift for you , my little friend ignorant.


http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3936571?dopt=Abstract

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/manchester/6228040.stm

the hitting power of frank bruno and ricky hatton...400kg(800pounds) both:rofl

holyfield faced old foreman, tyson, lewis, bowe ,bert cooper and he was the sparring partner of david tua and he said that foreman was the hardest puncher. so you are saying that bruno was harder puncher than tyson,lewis and tua.:rofl

I challenge you to show me only a proof to prove that it is real. (not 4 bums talking nonsense on a stupid forum).

then ricky hatton was harder puncher than foreman, tyson, and ruddock lmao

 

lyle by ko in 5 rounds. too good pack for this version of tyson.( very strong,very powerful, very durable, too much heart,long reach,good chin,heart of gladiator, and he fought for the victory, not only for money). the great factor is. lyle was stronger mentally and he was an exconvict, he could not be intimidated. tyson would have not his habitual advantage of intimidation, lyle was not scared even by foreman. this version of tyson was finished mentally,he had bad stamina, he got worse combinations at this time, he was more slow, he did not have the great defence that he had in 86-88, he fought for money, he had no heart. he destroyed bums like mcneley or bruno, he never did beat a warrior at this time, lyle was a warrior.

 

:tired god.. what a ****ing boring clown,go to say your **** opinion to your ******ed dad and forget me clown. i don´t care for your **** opinion.

 

of course ali was weak physically compared with george foreman,ali was a stylist and foreman was a powerful puncher who had bigger and stronger structure of bones and stronger musculature, of course foreman was much stronger than marciano who weighed 178-187 pounds.(i never said 10 times, it is other of your stupid lies of kid, possibly for the numerous times that i humiliated you). and you know nothing about boxing, you did show it several times. bye sweetheart:hi:

 

i remember a interview with joe frazier
joe anyone did think that you was finished post the foreman fight, but you fought a war in 1975 against ali in manilla.
well, they were 2 different men, foreman was a much stronger man who did hit like a hammer and ali did talk so much but he was not too much in the ring.

[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vqoFh-rFlo0[/ame]
check the last part against ali, frazier did handle ali easy, frazier was a much stronger man physically.

[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BqreTRfpUPY[/ame]
check how foreman did handle frazier and norton...


[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZnT5KBxgQao&feature=related[/ame]
ali could not with norton or frazier physically ,they both were stronger than ali but you are saying that foreman was not much stronger than ali. and george was much stronger than frazier and norton.

ali never did handle foreman by his strength, foreman was tired, ali had very fast hands, it is all. you do know what you are talking... and foreman was much heavier and bigger than marciano, plus he was a very strong man by genetics, obviously he was much stronger than marciano who was not even a hw. the heaviest marciano weighed 189 pounds, the heaviest young foreman weighed 232 pounds, not only the weight, a big strong man is always stronger than a small strong man. and it is evident... foreman had a stronger body... the arms of marciano were a joke compared with the arms of george. check foreman and marciano hitting the heavy bag...and check they both training his strength no contest.maybe you will tell me that marciano(178-187 pounds) might work his legs with a young cow of 500 pounds on his back(easily), (a young foreman did it).
joseph louis barrow and jack dempsey in 1974 said that foreman was by far the strongest fighter and the most powerful fighter that they saw ever.. adn they saw liston,carnera,marciano,baer,shavers...
obviously you don´t care about george and you talk any **** about him. you are a ****ing clown.

 

great comment, it show your great intelligence.

 

.
atschi said , that foreman was much stronger and he was harder puncher, i never said that the hitting power is = strength . really, sometimes i ask to myself if you are serious, because you say tons of crap. you need learn about boxing. when you said " ali did handle foreman in the clinch by his physical strength" you did show the ignorant(or the liar) that you are, plain and simple. ali was very very fast with his hands , Foreman did not have a fixed point to apply his force, ali was moving constantly in thre early rounds and foreman was tired later. Foreman did a different work, he did not use the power as he did against norton or frazier. he was looking for the moment to hit cleanly to ali.ali was too fast,too smart, foreman could not even think as he should fight. ali was different to any fighter that he faced before. foreman used his brutal strength against predictable fighters o pressure fighters. the fight against ali was different, he was trying to avoid the fast hands from ali in the early rounds, and later he was tired. if you are saying that george foreman was not a much stronger guy than muhammad ali(who had a weak structure,he was a stylist), you know pure crap about boxing, it is a fact.