Mythbusting: Wlad had a greater size advantage than Ali

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Rock0052, Dec 13, 2014.


  1. Rock0052

    Rock0052 Loyal Member Full Member

    34,249
    5,939
    Apr 30, 2006
    The numbers don't lie- I crunched them on Excel using weights from Boxrec. When weights were unavailable, I used the highest listed numbers for surrounding fights for Wlad, and the lowest for his opponents to model it as conservatively as possible. All figures are per fight. I can go more in depth with this as far as wins/losses go against different sized opponents if the interest is there.


    Here's the results thus far:
    .........................Wlad..............Opponent
    Average Weight:..236.4.................. 234.8

    lb difference...1.59

    % difference.....0.67%


    ..........................................Ali........... Opponent
    Average weight:............... 211.1...............204.45
    Average Pre-exile Weight: 200.6...............198.72
    Average Post-exile Weight 220.6...............209.64

    lb difference Pre-Exile: 1.8
    lb difference Post-Exile: 11.0
    Overall average lb difference: 6.6

    Overall lb difference %: 3.15%
    Overall lb diff % Pre-Exile: 0.92%
    Overall lb diff % Post-Exile: 4.98%
     
  2. LittleRed

    LittleRed Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,850
    246
    Feb 19, 2012
    Ali was a fatty post exile. I think height would be more informative although I appreciate the information.
     
  3. Rock0052

    Rock0052 Loyal Member Full Member

    34,249
    5,939
    Apr 30, 2006
    :good The weight gain mirrors the difference I saw in him as a fighter- a little slower and less mobile, but physically stronger. He also took a better shot from bigger punchers (both figuratively and literally, as his pre-exile opponents were almost exclusively Cruiserweight sized).

    I'd initially planned on doing height and weight for each. If it was quicker verifying height than manually tracking down the inputs for the ~120 plus fighters they've fought one by one, I'd have it :lol:.

    This is one case where having everything on one page to start with, like boxrec does with weights, makes it handy. Tracking weight is also easier because it's much more concrete and harder to *****; height can fluctuate from source to source.

    The goal here is to strip away preconceptions and assumptions and put some cold, hard data out there for anyone who wants to see it.

    I can run the numbers for other heavyweights, but it seemed like with the busier-than-usual Wlad-Ali talk, it'd be a good place to start.
     
  4. VVMM

    VVMM Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,372
    344
    Nov 16, 2012
    And what does this unimportant **** mean ?
    The boxing isn't about who can beat the fattest men alive.
     
  5. Rock0052

    Rock0052 Loyal Member Full Member

    34,249
    5,939
    Apr 30, 2006
    The thread's been blessed by your presence. How unimportant could it be?
     
  6. Vanboxingfan

    Vanboxingfan Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,591
    256
    Feb 5, 2005
    so the average weight of Wlad's opponents is 234.8, well if their average height is say 6'0" that tells me he's probably fighting a lot of fat fighters, relative to say their average height being 6'5 or so. Seems to me that if he's 6'6 or thereabouts his in shape opponents should be roughly the same size.
     
  7. Rock0052

    Rock0052 Loyal Member Full Member

    34,249
    5,939
    Apr 30, 2006
    As explained, the height's more time consuming to hammer out.

    Once that's completed, I'll update that, as well.

    My initial hypothesis is that Wlad would typically have a 2-3 inch average height advantage, with Ali's being about 1.5-2.5. I'll know once it's done.:good
     
  8. Vanboxingfan

    Vanboxingfan Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,591
    256
    Feb 5, 2005
    I was merely pointing out the relevancy of it. But I realize it's a pretty time consuming exercise. Height and reach mean everything in boxing. Witness Duran vs Hearns, they may very well weighed the same, but that really wasn't relevant.
     
  9. Bokaj

    Bokaj Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    28,695
    14,074
    Jan 4, 2008
    So when Ali came to fights in good shape and not fat he had virtually no weight advantage over his opponents? That's interesting and a bit surprising.

    That he had a "weight advantage" when fat means nothing. It's not like Wlad would be a better fighter either if he put on 20 lbs of fat. If fat counted, then Ali beat a bonafide super HW in Mathis.
     
  10. Rock0052

    Rock0052 Loyal Member Full Member

    34,249
    5,939
    Apr 30, 2006
    1) Let's run some more numbers for the heck of it: Pre-Exile, Ali was the heavier man 18/29 times, or 62% of the time.

    Post-exile, despite his opponents weighing 10 lbs more a pop on average, he was the heavier man 25/32 times, or 78% of the time.

    Overall, that's a ratio of 70.4%.

    Another surprising takeaway is that Wlad was only the heavier man 35/66 times in his career, or 53%.

    I'm not getting compensated enough to judge body fat composition per fight :lol:.
     
  11. Rock0052

    Rock0052 Loyal Member Full Member

    34,249
    5,939
    Apr 30, 2006
    Of course it is. Critics on either side of the fence have been and will continue to say Ali beat up Cruiserweights and Wlad bullies fat guys. No numbers on an Excel page was going to stop that tidal wave.....

    But it can add to it!

    I'm realistic about the audience. Any interest in them will likely be subject to more twisting than a Twizzler factory to back up the position they already held.
     
  12. tommygun711

    tommygun711 The Future Full Member

    15,756
    102
    Dec 26, 2009
    Uh... What about Vitali? There's a reason Wlad never wanted to fight his big bro.
     
  13. Wass1985

    Wass1985 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,436
    2,839
    Feb 18, 2012
    Have you got a brother because you do talk out of your ass?!?!
     
  14. N_ N___

    N_ N___ Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,203
    93
    Oct 1, 2014

    There's no relevance if you're comparing them to fighters who had to make weight.
     
  15. LittleRed

    LittleRed Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,850
    246
    Feb 19, 2012
    I would be interested if James Toney had a size advantage over his opponents at heavyweight. Something tells me it'd be close.